Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32287903›Full record

ArticleMedicine2018

[Infections in critically ill patients].

M J Asensio Martín, M Hernández Bernal, S Yus Teruel, A Minvielle

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

M J Asensio MartínServicio de Medicina Intensiva. Hospital Universitario La Paz-Carlos III/IdiPAZ, Madrid, España.
M Hernández BernalServicio de Medicina Intensiva. Hospital Universitario La Paz-Carlos III/IdiPAZ, Madrid, España.
S Yus TeruelServicio de Medicina Intensiva. Hospital Universitario La Paz-Carlos III/IdiPAZ, Madrid, España.
A MinvielleServicio de Medicina Intensiva. Hospital Universitario La Paz-Carlos III/IdiPAZ, Madrid, España.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInfections are very frequent in patients who are admitted to Intensive Care Units, sometimes being a reason for admission and in others the infection is acquired during ICU stay. EPIDEMIOLOGY: The most frequent causes of acquired infection in the community that require admission to the ICU are respiratory infections, urinary tract infections and infections of the central nervous system. Among the infections acquired in the ICU, devices-associated infections are the most frequent. ETIOLOGY: The most frequent in ICU are Gram negative pathogens. ETIOPATHOGENESIS: In the critical patient, several factors are combined making them especially vulnerable to infections. CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS: Depends on the location of the infection. DIAGNOSIS: It must be early due to its increased mortality. PROGNOSIS: Nosocomial infections are associated with an increase in mortality and in the length of stay. TREATMENT: The delay in treatment is associated with an increase in mortality.

Indexed as

Devices-associated infectionsIntensive care unitNosocomial infecctions

Identifiers

PMID32287903
PMCPMC7143597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.