Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32287533›Full record

ArticleTrends in analytical chemistry : TRAC2008

Nanostructures as analytical tools in bioassays.

A Gómez-Hens, J M Fernández-Romero, M P Aguilar-Caballos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in analytical chemistry : TRAC, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Kinetics of particle wrapping by a vesicle.The Journal of chemical physics · 2013
    Article
  8. Towards in vitro molecular diagnostics using nanostructures.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2012
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Nanomaterials as analytical tools for genosensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2010
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

A Gómez-HensDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, "Marie Curie Annex" Building, Campus of Rabanales, University of Córdoba, E-14071 Córdoba, Spain.
J M Fernández-RomeroDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, "Marie Curie Annex" Building, Campus of Rabanales, University of Córdoba, E-14071 Córdoba, Spain.
M P Aguilar-CaballosDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, "Marie Curie Annex" Building, Campus of Rabanales, University of Córdoba, E-14071 Córdoba, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We critically evaluate the usefulness of different nanostructures described as labels, nanoscaffolds or separation media in immunoassays and nucleic-acid hybridization assays. Many of the great number of publications describe only theoretical aspects of using these nanostructures or nanoparticles, but do not verify their applicability in the presence of potential interferents that can be present in the sample matrix. We attempt a systematic study of the advantages and the limitations of using these new reagents in bioassays, the different assay formats for individual and multiplexed detection, and the capability of these assays in analyzing real samples.

Indexed as

ImmunoassayIndividual assayMultiplexed assayNanoparticleNucleic acid

Identifiers

PMID32287533
PMCPMC7112833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.