Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32287410›Full record

ArticleTechnological forecasting and social change2011

Literature-related discovery: Potential treatments and preventatives for SARS.

Ronald N Kostoff

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technological forecasting and social change, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. WASH to control COVID-19: A rapid review.Frontiers in public health · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Recent advances in biomedical literature mining.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021
    Review
  5. Human coronaviruses and therapeutic drug discovery.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2021
    Review
  6. Impact of COVID-19 on the travel and tourism industry.Technological forecasting and social change · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Tracking and Mining the COVID-19 Research Literature.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Literature-related discovery and innovation - update.Technological forecasting and social change · 2012
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ronald N KostoffGeorgia Institute of Technology, School of Public Policy, USA.
Georgia Institute of Technology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Literature-related discovery (LRD) is the linking of two or more previously disjoint concepts in order to produce novel, interesting, plausible, and intelligible connections (i.e., potential discovery). LRD has been used to identify potential treatments or preventative actions for challenging medical problems, among myriad other applications. Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) was the first pandemic of the 21st century. SARS was eventually controlled through increased hygienic measures (e.g., face mask protection, frequent hand washing, living quarter disinfection), travel restrictions, and quarantine. According to recent reviews of SARS, none of the drugs that were used during the pandemic worked. For the present paper, SARS was selected as the first application of LRD to an infectious disease. The main goal of this research was to identify non-drug non-surgical treatments that would 1) prevent the occurrence, or 2) reduce the progression rate, or 3) stop/reverse the progression of SARS. The MeSH taxonomy of Medline was used to restrict potential discoveries to selected semantic classes, and to identify potential discoveries efficiently. To enhance the volume of potential discovery, databases were used in addition to Medline. These included the Science Citation Index (SCI) and, in contrast to previous work, a full text database. Because of the richness of the full text, 'surgical' queries were developed that targeted the exact types of potential discovery of interest while eliminating clutter more efficiently.

Indexed as

Infectious diseaseLiterature-based discoveryLiterature-related-discoveryRadical discoveryRadical innovationSevere acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)Text mining

Identifiers

PMID32287410
PMCPMC7118796
OpenAlexW2048618676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.