ReviewActa chirurgica Austriaca1997
Gene therapy in surgery: Part II: Application to septic shock and to organ transplantation.
Review in Acta chirurgica Austriaca, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWith the increasing body of knowledge in molecular biology, gene transfer respectively gene therapy becomes more and more a valid therapeutic option.
methodsThis is a critical review of gene therapy protocols for treatment of different types of cancer. Furthermore, the pathophysiological mechanism, therapeutically strategies as well as experimental approaches toward gene transfer in septic shock and organ transplantation are critically elucidated.
resultsGene transfer as a therapeutic option was first successfully applied in children with severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) in 1990. The majority of gene marking or gene therapy protocols approved for human clinical trials to date are related to the treatment of cancer. Besides viral vectors for brain tumors, non-viral vectors, liposomes particularly, with almost no side effects are increasingly used.
conclusionsDifferent approaches of gene transfer in cancer patients are under investigation. Experimental data of septic shock treatment and rejection therapy of the allograft in organ recipients with gene transfer are encouraging for future applications in clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.