Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32287320›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Racial/ethnic disparities in colorectal cancer treatment utilization and phase-specific costs, 2000-2014.

Angela C Tramontano, Yufan Chen, Tina R Watson, Andrew Eckel, Chin Hur, Chung Yin Kong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Effects of location of primary tumor on survival after pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2025
    Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Providers' and survivors' perspectives on the availability and accessibility of surgery in gastrointestinal cancer care.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Angela C TramontanoInstitute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Yufan ChenInstitute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3501-9807
Tina R WatsonInstitute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Andrew EckelInstitute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Chin HurColumbia University Medical Center, New York City, New York, United States of America.
Chung Yin KongInstitute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6431-7830
Massachusetts General Hospital · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USHarvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOur study analyzed disparities in utilization and phase-specific costs of care among older colorectal cancer patients in the United States. We also estimated the phase-specific costs by cancer type, stage at diagnosis, and treatment modality.

methodsWe used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database to identify patients aged 66 or older diagnosed with colon or rectal cancer between 2000-2013, with follow-up to death or December 31, 2014. We divided the patient's experience into separate phases of care: staging or surgery, initial, continuing, and terminal. We calculated total, cancer-attributable, and patient-liability costs. We fit logistic regression models to determine predictors of treatment receipt and fit linear regression models to determine relative costs. All costs are reported in 2019 US dollars.

resultsOur cohort included 90,023 colon cancer patients and 25,581 rectal cancer patients. After controlling for patient and clinical characteristics, Non-Hispanic Blacks were less likely to receive treatment but were more likely to have higher cancer-attributable costs within different phases of care. Overall, in both the colon and rectal cancer cohorts, mean monthly cost estimates were highest in the terminal phase, next highest in the staging phase, decreased in the initial phase, and were lowest in the continuing phase.

conclusionsRacial/ethnic disparities in treatment utilization and costs persist among colorectal cancer patients. Additionally, colorectal cancer costs are substantial and vary widely among stages and treatment modalities. This study provides information regarding cost and treatment disparities that can be used to guide clinical interventions and future resource allocation to reduce colorectal cancer burden.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAgeismAsianBlack or African AmericanColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHealth Care CostsHealthcare DisparitiesHispanic or LatinoHumansMaleRacismUnited States

Identifiers

PMID32287320
PMCPMC7156060
OpenAlexW3015358046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.