Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32287303›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Time trends in and factors associated with repeat adolescent birth in Uganda: Analysis of six demographic and health surveys.

Dinah Amongin, Annettee Nakimuli, Claudia Hanson, Mary Nakafeero, Frank Kaharuza, Lynn Atuyambe, Lenka Benova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A multicenter study on the mental health of Brazilian adolescent mothers, 2024.Epidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Repeated adolescent pregnancy in Brazil from 2015 to 2019.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dinah AmonginDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology School of Medicine, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0002-1420-005X
Annettee NakimuliDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology School of Medicine, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.
Claudia HansonDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, England.ORCID 0000-0001-8066-7873
Mary NakafeeroDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0003-2943-0744
Frank KaharuzaDepartment of Community Health and Behavioral Sciences, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Lynn AtuyambeDepartment of Community Health and Behavioral Sciences, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Lenka BenovaFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, England.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 107742/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInformation on repeat adolescent birth remains scarce in sub-Sahara Africa. We investigated the prevalence and time trends in repeat adolescent birth in Uganda, and associated factors.

methodsWe analyzed Uganda Demographic and Health Survey data of women age 20-24 years collected on 6 surveys (1988/89-2016) to estimate repeat adolescent birth (first live birth <18 years of age followed by another live birth(s) <20 years). Further, we estimated the wantedness of the second order birth and the prevalence of short birth intervals birth (<13 months) between the first and second such birth. On the 2016 survey, we examined factors associated with repeat adolescent birth using bivariate and multivariate modified Poisson regression.

resultsAt the 1988/89 survey, 58.9% of women with first birth <18 years reported a repeat adolescent birth. This percentage increased to 66.8% in 2006 (+7.9 percentage points [pp], p = 0.010) and thereafter declined to 55.6% by 2016 (-11.2 pp, p<0.001), nevertheless, no change occurred between 1988/89 and 2016 (-3.3pp, p = 0.251). Among women with repeat adolescent births, the mean number of live births by exact age 20 years (2.2 births) and prevalence of short birth intervals (3.5% in 1988/89, 5.4% in 2016) (+1.9pp, p = 0.245) did not change. Increasingly more women with repeat adolescent births preferred to have had the second child later, 22.5% in 1995 and 43.1% in 2016 (+20.6pp, p = <0.001). On the 2016 survey, women from poorer households and those of younger age at first birth were significantly more likely to report repeat adolescent birth.

conclusionFollowing a first birth <18 years, more than half of the women report a repeat adolescent birth (<20 years), with no decline observed in 30 years. Increasingly more women wanted the second adolescent pregnancy later, highlighting the need to support adolescents with improved family planning services at each contact.

Indexed as

ParityAdolescentAdultBirth OrderBirth RateFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMaternal AgeParturitionPregnancyPregnancy in AdolescenceUgandaYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32287303
PMCPMC7156070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.