Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32287289›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

What anticipatory coarticulation in children tells us about speech motor control maturity.

Guillaume Barbier, Pascal Perrier, Yohan Payan, Mark K Tiede, Silvain Gerber, Joseph S Perkell, Lucie Ménard

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Practice and experience predict coarticulation in child speech.Language learning and development : the official journal of the Society for Language Development · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Guillaume BarbierGrenoble INP, CNRS, GIPSA-Lab UMR 5216, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Pascal PerrierGrenoble INP, CNRS, GIPSA-Lab UMR 5216, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2192-4176
Yohan PayanGrenoble INP, CNRS, TIMC-IMAG UMR 5525, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Mark K TiedeHaskins Laboratories, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Silvain GerberGrenoble INP, CNRS, GIPSA-Lab UMR 5216, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Joseph S PerkellBoston University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Lucie MénardDepartment of Linguistics, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Institut polytechnique de Grenoble · FRBoston University · USHaskins Laboratories · USUniversité du Québec à Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to evaluate the role of motor control immaturity in the speech production characteristics of 4-year-old children, compared to adults. Specifically, two indices were examined: trial-to-trial variability, which is assumed to be linked to motor control accuracy, and anticipatory extra-syllabic vowel-to-vowel coarticulation, which is assumed to be linked to the comprehensiveness, maturity and efficiency of sensorimotor representations in the central nervous system.

methodAcoustic and articulatory (ultrasound) data were recorded for 20 children and 10 adults, all native speakers of Canadian French, during the production of isolated vowels and vowel-consonant-vowel (V1-C-V2) sequences. Trial-to-trial variability was measured in isolated vowels. Extra-syllabic anticipatory coarticulation was assessed in V1-C-V2 sequences by measuring the patterns of variability of V1 associated with variations in V2. Acoustic data were reported for all subjects and articulatory data, for a subset of 6 children and 2 adults.

resultsTrial-to-trial variability was significantly larger in children. Systematic and significant anticipation of V2 in V1 was always found in adults, but was rare in children. Significant anticipation was observed in children only when V1 was /a/, and only along the antero-posterior dimension, with a much smaller magnitude than in adults. A closer analysis of individual speakers revealed that some children showed adult-like anticipation along this dimension, whereas the majority did not.

conclusionThe larger trial-to-trial variability and the lack of anticipatory behavior in most children-two phenomena that have been observed in several non-speech motor tasks-support the hypothesis that motor control immaturity may explain a large part of the differences observed between speech production in adults and 4-year-old children, apart from other causes that may be linked with language development.

Indexed as

AcousticsAdultAnticipation, PsychologicalCanadaChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansLanguageLanguage DevelopmentMalePhoneticsPsychomotor PerformanceSound SpectrographySpeechSpeech AcousticsSpeech Articulation Tests

Identifiers

PMID32287289
PMCPMC7156059
OpenAlexW3015325275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.