Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32287262›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Feasibility of implementing the World Health Organization case management guideline for possible serious bacterial infection among young infants in Ntcheu district, Malawi.

Tanya Guenther, Gladson Mopiwa, Humphreys Nsona, Shamim Qazi, Regina Makuluni, Chancy Banda Fundani, Jenda Gomezgani, Leslie Mgalula, Mike Chisema, Salim Sadruddin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tanya GuentherUnitaid, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5192-2983
Gladson MopiwaThe Joint TB/HIV Global Fund -ActionAid, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Humphreys NsonaIMCI Unit, Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Shamim QaziDepartment of Maternal Newborn Child and Adolescent Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9688-9259
Regina MakuluniDistrict Health Office, Ministry of Health, Ntcheu, Malawi.
Chancy Banda FundaniDistrict Health Office, Ministry of Health, Ntcheu, Malawi.
Jenda GomezganiSave the Children Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Leslie MgalulaWorld Health Organization, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Mike ChisemaDistrict Health Office, Ministry of Health, Ntcheu, Malawi.
Salim SadruddinGlobal Malaria Program, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6023-2477
Ministry of Health · MWWorld Health Organization · CHWorld Health Organization - Malawi · MW

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeonatal sepsis is a leading cause of mortality, yet the recommended inpatient treatment options are inaccessible to most families in low-income settings. In 2015, the World Health Organization released a guideline for outpatient treatment of young infants (0-59 days of age) with possible serious bacterial infection (PSBI) with simplified antibiotic regimens when referral was not feasible. If implemented widely, this guideline could prevent many deaths. Our implementation research evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of implementing the WHO guideline through the existing health system in Malawi.

methodsA prospective cohort study was conducted in 12 first-level health facilities in Ntcheu district. Trained health workers identified and treated young infants with PSBI signs with injection gentamicin for 2 days and oral amoxicillin for 7 days, whereas those with only fast breathing were treated with oral amoxicillin for 7 days. Health Surveillance Assistants (HSAs) were trained to promote care-seeking and to conduct home visits on day 3 and 6 to assess infants under treatment, encourage treatment adherence and remind the caregiver to return for facility follow up. Infants receiving outpatient treatment were followed up at health facility on day 4 and 8. The primary outcome was proportion of outpatient cases completing treatment per protocol.

findingsA total of 358 infants received outpatient treatment (202 clinical severe infection, 156 only fast breathing) from February to September 2017. Of these, 92.7% (332/358) met criteria for treatment completion and 88.8% (318/358) completed the day 4 follow-up. Twelve (3.4%) young infants clinically failed treatment with no reported deaths in those treated at outpatient level. This treatment failure rate was lower than those reported for the simplified regimens tested in the SATT (8-10%) and AFRINEST (5-8%) equivalency trials. More than half of infants (58.1%; 208/358) received HSA follow-up visits on days 3 and 6.

conclusionStudy results demonstrate the feasibility of outpatient treatment for sick young infants when referral is not feasible in Malawi, which will inform scale-up in other parts of Malawi and countries with similar health system constraints.

Indexed as

Case ManagementGuidelines as TopicWorld Health OrganizationBacterial InfectionsFeasibility StudiesFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalawiOutpatientsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID32287262
PMCPMC7156088
OpenAlexW3015797060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.