Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32287118›Full record

ReviewAnesthesia and analgesia2020

Realistically Integrating Machine Learning Into Clinical Practice: A Road Map of Opportunities, Challenges, and a Potential Future.

Ira S Hofer, Michael Burns, Samir Kendale, Jonathan P Wanderer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Anesthesia and analgesia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The use of natural language processing in detecting and predicting falls within the healthcare setting: a systematic review.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Deep Learning in Scaphoid Nonunion Treatment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Transfusion in trauma: empiric or guided therapy?Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Machine Learning Operations in Health Care: A Scoping Review.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ira S HoferFrom the Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Michael BurnsDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Samir KendaleDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care and Pain Medicine, New York University Langone School of Medicine, New York, New York.
Jonathan P WandererDepartments of Anesthesiology and Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.

Funding

Machine Learning of Physiological Waveforms and Electronic Health Record Data to Predict, Diagnose, and Treat Hemodynamic Instability in Surgical PatientsR01HL144692 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CANNESSON, MAXIME · 2019 to 2023
$3.5M
Biomedical Informatics Tools for Applied Perioperative PhysiologyR01EB029751 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CANNESSON, MAXIME · 2020 to 2023
$2.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL144692NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB029751
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AnesthesiologyForecastingHumansMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID32287118
PMCPMC7584400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.