Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32286717›Full record

ReviewJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2021

A Perspective on MR Fingerprinting.

Jakob Assländer

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cramér-Rao Bound Optimized Subspace Reconstruction in Quantitative MRI.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Optimization of spin-lock times for TScientific reports · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Optimization of spin-lock times in TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jakob AssländerCenter for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2288-038X
New York University · US

Funding

TR&D 4: Revealing Microstructure: Biophysical modeling and validation for discovery and clinical careP41EB017183 · NIBIB · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Hersh Chandarana · 2014 to 2026
$19.3M
Development of Multi-Compartment MR-Fingerprinting for Subvoxel Estimation of Quantitative Tissue BiomarkersR21EB027241 · NIBIB · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI ASSLAENDER, JAKOB, KNOLL, FLORIAN · 2019 to 2020
$462k
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB017183NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB027241
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article reviews the basic concept of MR fingerprinting (MRF) with the goal of highlighting MRF's key contributions, putting them in the context of other quantitative MRI literature, and refining MRF's terminology. The article discusses the robustness and flexibility of MRF's signature dictionary-matching reconstruction along with more advanced MRF reconstructions. A key feature of MRF is the lack of assumptions about the signal evolution, which gives scientists the flexibility to tailor sequences for their needs. The article argues that the concept of unique fingerprints does not capture the requirements for successful parameter mapping and that an analysis of the signal's derivatives with respect to biophysical parameters, such as relaxation times, is more informative, as it allows one to evaluate the efficiency of a pulse sequence. The article points at the source of MRF's efficiency, namely, flip angle variations at the time scale of the relaxation times, and reveals that MRF's advantages are strongest at long scan times, as required for 3D imaging. Further, it outlines how MRF's flexibility can be used to design mutually tailored pulse sequences and biophysical models with the goal of improving the reproducibility of parameter mapping biological tissue. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 1.

Indexed as

BrainMagnetic Resonance ImagingImage Processing, Computer-AssistedReproducibility of ResultsMRFparameter mappingqMRIquantitative MRIrelaxometry

Identifiers

PMID32286717
PMCPMC7554187
OpenAlexW3015961530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.