Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32286714›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology2020

Illuminating the mysteries of wolf history.

Rena M Schweizer, Robert K Wayne

Abstract readNewsComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rena M SchweizerDivision of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8812-8177
Robert K WayneDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3537-2245

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the most enduring surprises about the genetic history of Late Pleistocene populations is that continuity is often disturbed by upheaval. In fact, studies that support population continuity are increasingly rare in humans, a variety of vertebrate taxa, and vascular plants (Hofreiter & Stewart 2009; Burbrink et al. 2016). Perhaps such continuity should not be expected as the Pleistocene is marked by episodes of climate change, glaciation and the invasions of humans into previously isolated areas. Although fossils are one of the primary sources for inferring population continuity, a problem with fossil material is that, even if similar morphological forms might exist in a place over time, they may not be from the same genetic lineage. There are now readily available methods to assess genetic continuity solely from DNA found in fossil material, provided the record is fairly continuous. In a From the Cover article in this issue of Molecular Ecology, Loog et al. (2020) apply some of these readily available methods to analyse mitochondrial genomes and model the demography of wolves over the last 50,000 years.

Indexed as

AnimalsClimate ChangeDNA, AncientDNA, MitochondrialFossilsHumansWolvesDNA, AncientDNA, Mitochondrialancient DNAgenomics/proteomicsmammalsPleistocene megafaunapopulation genetics - empiricalwolves

Identifiers

PMID32286714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.