Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32286534›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2020

Fluid balance and phase angle as assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis in critically ill patients: a multicenter prospective cohort study.

Nadine Denneman, Lara Hessels, Bo Broens, Jolijn Gjaltema, Sandra N Stapel, Julius Stohlmann, Maarten W Nijsten, Heleen M Oudemans-van Straaten

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Association between phase angle and adverse clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: A systematic review.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nadine DennemanDepartment of Adult Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. n.denneman@amsterdamumc.nl.
Lara HesselsDepartment of Critical Care, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Bo BroensDepartment of Adult Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jolijn GjaltemaDepartment of Adult Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sandra N StapelDepartment of Adult Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Julius StohlmannDepartment of Adult Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maarten W NijstenDepartment of Critical Care, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Heleen M Oudemans-van StraatenDepartment of Adult Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is a validated method to assess body composition in persons with fluid homeostasis and reliable body weight. This is not the case during critical illness. The raw BIA markers resistance, reactance, phase angle, and vector length are body weight independent. Phase angle reflects cellular health and has prognostic significance. We aimed to assess the course of phase angle and vector length during intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and determine the relation between their changes (Δ) and changes in body hydration.

methodsA prospective, dual-center observational study of adult ICU patients was conducted. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were performed, including reactance as a marker of cellular mass and integrity and total body water according to the Biasioli equation (TBW

resultsOne hundred and fifty-six ICU patients (mean ± SD age 62.5 ± 14.5 years, 67% male) were included. Between days 1 and 3, there was a significant decrease in reactance/m (-2.6 ± 6.0 Ω), phase angle (-0.4 ± 1.1°), and vector length (-12.2 ± 44.3 Ω/m). Markers of hydration significantly increased. Δphase angle and Δvector length were both positively related to Δreactance/m (r

conclusionsOur results show that during critical illness, changes in phase angle and vector length partially reflect changes in hydration.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessWater-Electrolyte BalanceAdultAgedBody CompositionElectric ImpedanceFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedProspective Studies

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.