Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32286452›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Deep Learning Predicts Total Knee Replacement from Magnetic Resonance Images.

Aniket A Tolpadi, Jinhee J Lee, Valentina Pedoia, Sharmila Majumdar

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06190977 (Effects of the Otago Exercise Program on Rehabilitation Outcomes of Balance, Strength and Functional Outcomes in Post-Operative Total Knee Replacement Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 68 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06190977 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Effects of the Otago Exercise Program on Rehabilitation Outcomes of Balance, Strength and Functional Outcomes in Post-Operative Total Knee Replacement Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled44ConditionsTotal Knee ReplacementArmsOtago Exercise Program, General TKR pprotocol
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aniket A TolpadiDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3974-4838
Jinhee J LeeDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Valentina PedoiaDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Sharmila MajumdarDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, USA. Sharmila.Majumdar@ucsf.edu.

Funding

Deep Learning for Characterizing Knee Joint Degeneration Predicting Progression of Osteoarthritis and Total Knee ReplacementR61AR073552 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MAJUMDAR, SHARMILA, PEDOIA, VALENTINA · 2018 to 2019
$871k
Multidimensional MRI-based Non-Euclidean Deep Learning to Study OsteoarthritisR00AR070902 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI PEDOIA, VALENTINA · 2018 to 2020
$747k
NIAMS NIH HHS R00 AR070902NIAMS NIH HHS R61 AR073552
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knee Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common musculoskeletal disorder in the United States. When diagnosed at early stages, lifestyle interventions such as exercise and weight loss can slow OA progression, but at later stages, only an invasive option is available: total knee replacement (TKR). Though a generally successful procedure, only 2/3 of patients who undergo the procedure report their knees feeling "normal" post-operation, and complications can arise that require revision. This necessitates a model to identify a population at higher risk of TKR, particularly at less advanced stages of OA, such that appropriate treatments can be implemented that slow OA progression and delay TKR. Here, we present a deep learning pipeline that leverages MRI images and clinical and demographic information to predict TKR with AUC 0.834 ± 0.036 (p < 0.05). Most notably, the pipeline predicts TKR with AUC 0.943 ± 0.057 (p < 0.05) for patients without OA. Furthermore, we develop occlusion maps for case-control pairs in test data and compare regions used by the model in both, thereby identifying TKR imaging biomarkers. As such, this work takes strides towards a pipeline with clinical utility, and the biomarkers identified further our understanding of OA progression and eventual TKR onset.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeDeep LearningAgedCase-Control StudiesDatasets as TopicFemaleHumansKnee JointMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedObservational Studies as TopicOsteoarthritis, KneeProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeUnited States

Identifiers

PMID32286452
PMCPMC7156761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.