Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32286450›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2020

Association between olfactory function and inhibition of emotional competing distractors in major depressive disorder.

Fang Wang, Jin Jin, Jun Wang, Ruoqiao He, Kaiyun Li, Xiaonan Hu, Yongchao Li, Yuncheng Zhu

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. [Depressive disorders and olfactory dysfunction].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Fang WangShanghai Yangpu Mental Health Center, Shanghai, 200093, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8963-9203
Jin JinShanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200030, China.
Jun WangShanghai Yangpu Mental Health Center, Shanghai, 200093, China.
Ruoqiao HeSilver School of Social Work, New York University, New York, 10003, USA.
Kaiyun LiUniversity of Jinan, Jinan, 250022, China.
Xiaonan HuShanghai Yangpu Mental Health Center, Shanghai, 200093, China.
Yongchao LiShanghai Yangpu Mental Health Center, Shanghai, 200093, China.
Yuncheng ZhuShanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200030, China. hellfiregenius@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4686-8887
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CNShanghai Mental Health Center · CNNew York University · USUniversity of Jinan · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to investigate the changes of olfaction of major depressive disorder (MDD) before and after medical treatment, and to preliminarily scrutinize the association between the olfactory function and the severity of depressive symptoms, response inhibition, and emotional responding. Forty-eight medicine-naïve MDD patients plus 33 healthy controls (HC) matched on gender, ages, and level of education, were recruited in the test group. The Chinese Smell Identification Test (CSIT), Self-reported Olfactory Scale (SROS), 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA), and mean reaction time/accuracy rate (ΔMRT) of emotional Stroop test were measured. The patients were assessed before the treatment (baseline) and 3 months after the treatment (follow-up). The data at the baseline level were measured then associated using multiple linear regression stepwise analysis. The MDD patients had lower scores of the CSIT and SROS and longer ΔMRT at baseline level compared to HC while the ΔMRT of MDD patients remained longer after 3-month treatment (p's < 0.05). At the baseline level, the regression equation including age and ΔMRT of negative word-color congruent (NEG-C), was finally observed as follows: y(CSIT) = 10.676-0.063 × 1-0.002 × 2, [x

Indexed as

Inhibition, PsychologicalAdultAge FactorsAntidepressive AgentsCase-Control StudiesCognitionEmotionsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedOlfaction DisordersOlfactory CortexOlfactory PerceptionAntidepressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID32286450
PMCPMC7156747
OpenAlexW3016119712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.