Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32286399›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Socially engaged calves are more likely to be colonised by VTEC O157:H7 than individuals showing signs of poor welfare.

Lena-Mari Tamminen, C Reed Hranac, Johan Dicksved, Erik Eriksson, Ulf Emanuelson, Linda J Keeling

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lena-Mari TamminenDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7054, SE-75007, Uppsala, Sweden. lena.mari.tamminen@slu.se.
C Reed HranacMolecular Epidemiology and Public Health Laboratory (mEpilab), Infectious Disease Research Centre, Hopkirk Research Institute, Massey University, Private Bag, 11-222, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Johan DicksvedDepartment of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7024, SE-75007, Uppsala, Sweden.
Erik ErikssonNational Veterinary Institute (SVA), SE-75189, Uppsala, Sweden.
Ulf EmanuelsonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7054, SE-75007, Uppsala, Sweden.
Linda J KeelingDepartment of Animal Environment and Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7068, SE-75007, Uppsala, Sweden.
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SEMassey University · NZSwedish Veterinary Agency · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In cattle herds, the transmission and persistence of VTEC O157:H7 (a serotype of verotoxin-producing Escherichia coli - known for its life threatening complications in humans) is dependent on a small proportion of cattle who become colonised and shed high numbers of the bacteria. Reducing the proportion of these animals is considered key for decreasing the prevalence of VTEC O157:H7. In this study, observations of calf behaviour and animal-based welfare indicators were used to explore individual risk factors and underlying drivers of colonisation in Swedish dairy calves. Interdependencies between variables led to three different approaches being used to visualize and explore the associations. Combining the results of all methods revealed similar patterns and suggest that healthy animals, actively grooming and interacting with others calves in the group have a higher risk of colonisation than small dairy calves in poor condition (diarrhoea, poor ruminal fill, poor body condition score and nasal discharge). This lends no support to the hypothesis that reduced welfare is a risk factor for VTEC O157:H7, but implies that individual differences in calf behaviour affect oral exposure to the bacteria so driving the risk of colonisation. This new finding has important implications for understanding of VTEC O157:H7 transmission within farms.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalSocial BehaviorAnimalsAnimal WelfareBacterial SheddingCattleCattle DiseasesEscherichia coli InfectionsEscherichia coli O157FarmsFecesFemaleMalePrevalence

Identifiers

PMID32286399
PMCPMC7156447
OpenAlexW3016100106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.