Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32286325›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

Computational analysis of pathological images enables a better diagnosis of TFE3 Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma.

Jun Cheng, Zhi Han, Rohit Mehra, Wei Shao, Michael Cheng, Qianjin Feng, Dong Ni, Kun Huang, Liang Cheng, Jie Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. [Clinicopathological features and survival analysis ofBeijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jun ChengNational-Regional Key Technology Engineering Laboratory for Medical Ultrasound, Guangdong Key Laboratory for Biomedical Measurements and Ultrasound Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering, Health Science Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5493-961X
Zhi HanDepartment of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5603-8433
Rohit MehraDepartment of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6955-8884
Wei ShaoDepartment of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9401-1186
Michael ChengDepartment of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Qianjin FengSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3830-5120
Dong NiNational-Regional Key Technology Engineering Laboratory for Medical Ultrasound, Guangdong Key Laboratory for Biomedical Measurements and Ultrasound Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering, Health Science Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China. nidong@szu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9146-6003
Kun HuangDepartment of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA. kunhuang@iu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8530-370X
Liang ChengDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA. lcheng@iupui.edu.
Jie ZhangDepartment of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA. jizhan@iu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6939-7905

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

TFE3 Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma (TFE3-RCC) generally progresses more aggressively compared with other RCC subtypes, but it is challenging to diagnose TFE3-RCC by traditional visual inspection of pathological images. In this study, we collect hematoxylin and eosin- stained histopathology whole-slide images of 74 TFE3-RCC cases (the largest cohort to date) and 74 clear cell RCC cases (ccRCC, the most common RCC subtype) with matched gender and tumor grade. An automatic computational pipeline is implemented to extract image features. Comparative study identifies 52 image features with significant differences between TFE3-RCC and ccRCC. Machine learning models are built to distinguish TFE3-RCC from ccRCC. Tests of the classification models on an external validation set reveal high accuracy with areas under ROC curve ranging from 0.842 to 0.894. Our results suggest that automatically derived image features can capture subtle morphological differences between TFE3-RCC and ccRCC and contribute to a potential guideline for TFE3-RCC diagnosis.

Indexed as

Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription FactorsCarcinoma, Renal CellComputational BiologyFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceKidney NeoplasmsMachine LearningMaleTranslocation, GeneticBasic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription FactorsTFE3 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID32286325
PMCPMC7156652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.