ArticleViral immunology2020
A Disquisition on MHC Restriction and T Cell Recognition in Five Acts.
Article in Viral immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Keystone Epitope Theory: An Ecological Perspective on RNA Viruses, Tumor Immunoediting, and Vaccine Design.Pathogens & immunity · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The seminal discovery in the early 1970s, credited to Peter Doherty and Rolf Zinkernagel, of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) restriction exhibited by cytotoxic T cells represented a major conceptual advance in understanding antigen recognition by conventional T cells. This advance also led to other major new insights into the ontogeny and immunobiology of T cells and catalyzed a renaissance in viral immunology. In this commentary in honor of Peter Doherty, I offer five brief reflections on different aspects of the phenomenon of MHC restriction and the process by which it was discovered and explained. In the first of these sections, I offer a reinterpretation of MHC restriction that reframes the constraints on self-MHC recognition in terms of the probabilities of recognizing a given nominal antigen peptide in the context of an MHC molecule that is nonself on the basis of differing in amino acid sequence from the self-restriction element at one or more positions. Subsequent sections address: (i) the ways in which general ideas, developed subsequent to the discovery of MHC restriction, about the intricacies of antigen recognition by antibodies apply to T cell receptors binding to MHC/peptide complexes; (ii) how to reconcile the existence of MHC restriction with the impressive magnitude of T cell responses to nonself MHC antigens; (iii) the possible relevance to MHC restriction and immune system function of ideas from mathematical logic that relate to the consequences of self-reference; and (iv) the implications for the philosophy of science of MHC restriction and the processes of its discovery and acceptance within the immunology research community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.