Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32285749›Full record

ArticleActa orthopaedica2020

Increases in the rates of primary and revision knee replacement are reducing: a 15-year registry study across 3 continents.

Peter L Lewis, Stephen E Graves, Otto Robertsson, Martin Sundberg, Elizabeth W Paxton, Heather A Prentice, Annette W-Dahl

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta orthopaedica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Radiolucent line assessment in cemented stemmed total knee (RISK) arthroplasty: validation of a modernized classification system.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Peter L LewisAustralian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, Adelaide, Australia;
Stephen E GravesAustralian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, Adelaide, Australia;
Otto RobertssonSwedish Knee Arthroplasty Register, Lund, Sweden.
Martin SundbergSwedish Knee Arthroplasty Register, Lund, Sweden.
Elizabeth W PaxtonSurgical Outcomes and Analysis, Kaiser Permanente, San Diego, CA, USA.
Heather A PrenticeSurgical Outcomes and Analysis, Kaiser Permanente, San Diego, CA, USA.
Annette W-DahlSwedish Knee Arthroplasty Register, Lund, Sweden.
Australian Orthopaedic Association · AUKaiser Permanente · USThe Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register · SELund University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose - Rates of knee replacement (KR) are increasing worldwide. Based on population and practice changes, there are forecasts of a further exponential increase in primary knee replacement through to 2030, and a corresponding increase in revision knee replacement. We used registry data to document changes in KR over the past 15 years, comparing practice changes across Sweden, Australia, and the United States. This may improve accuracy of future predictions.Patients and methods - Aggregated data from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register (SKAR), the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR), and the Kaiser Permanente Joint Replacement Registry (KPJRR) were used to compare surgical volume of primary and revision KR from 2003 to 2017. Incidence was calculated using population census statistics from Statistics Sweden and the Australian Bureau of Statistics, as well as the yearly active membership numbers from Kaiser Permanente. Further analysis of KR by age < 65 and ≥ 65 years was carried out.Results - All registries recorded an increase in primary and revision KR, with a greater increase seen in the KPJRR. The rate of increase slowed during the study period. In Sweden and Australia, there was a smaller increase in revision surgery compared with primary procedures. There was consistency in the mean age at surgery, with a steady small decrease in the proportion of women having primary KR. The incidence of KR in the younger age group remained low in all 3 registries, but the proportional increases were greater than those seen in the ≥ 65 years of age group.Interpretation - There has been a generalized deceleration in the rate of increase of primary and revision KR. While there are regional differences in KR incidence, and rates of change, the rate of increase does not seem to be as great as previously predicted.

Indexed as

AgedAge FactorsArthroplasty, ReplacementAustraliaFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesReoperationSex FactorsSwedenUnited States

Identifiers

PMID32285749
PMCPMC8023965
OpenAlexW3015422465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.