Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32285402›Full record

ArticlePharmacoEconomics - open2021

Do Rural Residents in China Understand EQ-5D-5L as Intended? Evidence From a Qualitative Study.

Fan Yang, Shan Jiang, Xiao-Ning He, Hong-Chao Li, Hong-Yan Wu, Tian-Tian Zhang, Jing Wu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PharmacoEconomics - open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Differences and common ground in the frameworks of health-related quality of life in traditional Chinese medicine and modern medicine: a systematic review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Challenges with interviewer administration of EQ-5D questionnaires in a large-scale population survey in China: a qualitative analysis.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The psychometric performance of the EQ-5D-5L composite and component items in the U.S. General population and by age group.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. China Health Related Outcomes Measures (CHROME): development of a descriptive system to support cardiovascular disease specific preference-based measure for the Chinese population.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Article
  16. Comparing EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in measuring the HRQoL burden of 4 health conditions in China.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2023
    Article
  17. Validating the Well-Being of Older People (WOOP) Instrument in China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. 'Like holding the axe on who should live or not': adolescents' and adults' perceptions of valuing children's health states using a standardised valuation protocol for the EQ-5D-Y-3L.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Fan YangCentre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK.
Shan JiangSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Xiao-Ning HeSchool of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Hong-Chao LiSchool of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.
Hong-Yan WuSchool of Medicine and Health Management, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China.
Tian-Tian ZhangCollege of Pharmacy, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Jing WuSchool of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China. jingwu@tju.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6012-2785
China Pharmaceutical University · CNGuiyang Medical University · CNJinan University · CNTianjin University · CNUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of York · GB

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 71463007National Natural Science Foundation of China 71673197National Natural Science Foundation of China 71804122
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) has been increasingly used in China to measure the health status of the general population and patients. However, its content validity among rural residents in China has not been formally evaluated. This qualitative study aims to assess the content validity of EQ-5D-5L among rural Chinese.

methodsParticipants were recruited from four regions (North, South, East and West) across China. Eligible participants were those living in the rural area in last three years and making a living by agricultural operations. Semi-structured interviews were conducted. Interview transcripts were analysed to assess the comprehensibility, relevance, clarity and comprehensiveness.

resultsSixty-two participants were included, comparable to the national figures regarding age, sex and education. For comprehensibility, participants could understand the 'mobility', 'self-care' and 'usual activities' domains well, but some reported confusions in 'pain/discomfort' (n = 42) and 'anxiety/depression' (n = 35). Some also reported difficulties in understanding anxiety (n = 6) and depression (n = 9), possibly due to the formal wording used. For relevance, all domains were reported as health-related and participants' responses were based on their own health. For clarity, all could distinguish the five levels, but suggestions on reducing response levels and alternative wording for 'slight' were raised. For comprehensiveness, two aspects (fatigue/energy and appetite) were raised beyond the EQ-5D-5L domains. The 'mobility' domain was selected as the most important and 'anxiety/depression' as the least important.

conclusionRural Chinese reported problems on the content validity of Chinese EQ-5D-5L. It might be sensible to consider some revisions to make it more understandable for rural residents.

Identifiers

PMID32285402
PMCPMC7895880
OpenAlexW3015688173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.