ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2020
Safety and feasibility of unilateral double femoral venous access including double sheath insertion via a single-hole method for adrenal venous sampling.
Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of three approaches for adrenal venous sampling in patients with primary aldosteronism.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2025Article
- Safety and Efficacy of Single Femoral Vein Puncture Technique for Double Access in Patent Foramen Ovale Closure Under ICE Guidance-A Single Center Experience of the "Two-In-One Technique".Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2025Article
- Successful Superficial Blood Sampling to Localize a Fibroblast Growth Factor-23-Producing Tumor.The American journal of case reports · 2024Article
- High Deep Femoral Artery Bifurcation Can Disturb Safe Femoral Venous Access: CT Assessment in Patients Who Underwent Femoral Venous Access Under Doppler Ultrasound Guidance.Interventional radiology (Higashimatsuyama-shi (Japan) · 2021Article
- Feasibility and effectiveness of a single-catheter approach for adrenal vein sampling in patients with primary aldosteronism.BMC endocrine disorders · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the safety and feasibility of unilateral double femoral venous access including double sheath insertion via a single-hole method (two-in-one method) for adrenal venous sampling (AVS). MATERIALS AND
methodsTwo 5-Fr sheaths were percutaneously inserted into a single femoral vein for AVS in 324 patients. Two needles were inserted sequentially in tandem under ultrasound guidance; furthermore, two sheaths were individually inserted (two-in-two method) if both punctures were successfully achieved. In the presence of a single puncture, two sheaths were inserted through two guidewires and a temporarily inserted sheath (two-in-one method). This protocol was repeated until two sheaths were successfully inserted. Thus, two sheaths were inserted with the two-in-one method in 56 patients (17.3%) and two-in-two method in 268 patients (82.7%).
resultsNo significant differences in the technical success rates of AVS were observed (p = 0.067-0.647). Minor groin hematoma was observed more frequently in the two-in-one than in the two-in-two method (8.9% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.039). No major groin hematoma, deep venous thrombosis, or pulmonary embolization was observed. The mean number of needle puncture was 2.5 ± 1.3 and duration of inserting two sheaths 5.1 ± 3.9 min.
conclusionUnilateral double femoral venous access including the two-in-one method is safe and feasible for AVS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32285379What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.