ArticleIrish journal of medical science2020
Defining clinicopathological and radiological features of breast cancer in women under the age of 35: an epidemiological study.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Breast self-examination among female medical students at Damascus University: A cross-sectional study.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Review
- Article
- Breast Cancer Knowledge and Practice of Breast Self-Examination among Female University Students, Gaza.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2021Article
- Evaluating the Clinical Utility of Routine Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and the Value of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Elderly Patients Diagnosed With Oestrogen Receptor Positive, Clinically Node Negative Breast Cancer.Breast cancer : basic and clinical research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionBreast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed female cancer. Diagnosis in younger women (under 35 years) is different to their older counterparts, and mammography is not considered as sensitive in this cohort. Consequentially, younger patients may present later with more advanced disease.
methodsThis is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively updated database containing consecutive patients who presented to the symptomatic breast unit of Galway University Hospital between 2009 and 2015. Patient clinicopathologic factors, clinical examination features, diagnostic radiological modalities and Bi-RADS score were all assessed. Data was analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 25.
resultsOne thousand eight hundred thirty-six patients were diagnosed with breast cancer, and of these, 51 (2.8%) patients were < 35 years. Invasive ductal carcinoma made up 90% of diagnosis, and 42% had an associated ductal carcinoma in situ. Fifty-four percent were high-grade tumours and 52% presented with stage III disease or greater. The main radiological tool used was ultrasound, which had a sensitivity of 87.50% (95% confidence interval [CI] 74.75 to 95.27%). Mammogram sensitivity was 86.84% (95% CI 71.91 to 95.59%). Magnetic resonance imaging was used in 29% of cases, with a sensitivity of 100.00% (95% CI 78.20 to 100.00%).
conclusionFemales under 35 tend to be diagnosed with aggressive, advanced stage tumours. Ultrasound remains the radiological test of choice, although diagnosis using mammography demonstrated a relatively high sensitivity compared with previous reports. This study emphasises the varying epidemiology of breast cancer in younger patients and the potential role of mammography in making radiological diagnosis in those who are symptomatic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.