Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32285357›Full record

ArticleMolecular imaging and biology2020

SimPET: a Preclinical PET Insert for Simultaneous PET/MR Imaging.

Jeong-Whan Son, Kyeong Yun Kim, Ji Yong Park, Kyuwan Kim, Yun-Sang Lee, Guen Bae Ko, Jae Sung Lee

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular imaging and biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Evaluation of a PET Insert for Trimodal Imaging: A Step Toward PET/MRI-Guided Focused Ultrasound.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Advances in Preclinical PET.Seminars in nuclear medicine · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Jeong-Whan Son *Brightonix Imaging Inc., Yeonmujang 5ga-gil, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, 04782, South Korea.
Kyeong Yun Kim *Brightonix Imaging Inc., Yeonmujang 5ga-gil, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, 04782, South Korea.
Ji Yong ParkDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea.
Kyuwan KimBrightonix Imaging Inc., Yeonmujang 5ga-gil, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, 04782, South Korea.
Yun-Sang LeeDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea.
Guen Bae KoBrightonix Imaging Inc., Yeonmujang 5ga-gil, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, 04782, South Korea. gbko@brtnx.com.
Jae Sung LeeBrightonix Imaging Inc., Yeonmujang 5ga-gil, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, 04782, South Korea. jaes@snu.ac.kr.
Seoul National University Hospital · KRNew Generation University College · ETSeoul National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSimPET/M7 system is a small-animal dedicated simultaneous positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) scanner. The SimPET insert has been upgraded from its prototype with a focus on count rate performance and sensitivity. The M7 scanner is a 1-T permanent magnet-based compact MRI system without any cryogens. Here, we present performance evaluation results of SimPET along with the results of mutual interference evaluation and simultaneously acquired PET/MR imaging. PROCEDURES: Following NEMA NU 4-2008 standard, we evaluated the performance of the SimPET system. The M7 MRI compatibility of SimPET was also assessed by analyzing MRI images of a uniform phantom under different PET conditions and PET count rates with different MRI pulse sequences. Mouse imaging was performed including a whole-body

resultsThe spatial resolution at center based on 3D OSEM without and with warm background was 0.7 mm and 1.45 mm, respectively. Peak sensitivity was 4.21 % (energy window = 250-750 keV). The peak noise equivalent count rate with the same energy window was 151 kcps at 38.4 MBq. The uniformity was 4.42 %, and the spillover ratios in water- and air-filled chambers were 14.6 % and 12.7 %, respectively. In the hot rod phantom image, 0.75-mm-diameter rods were distinguishable. There were no remarkable differences in the SNR and uniformity of MRI images and PET count rates with different PET conditions and MRI pulse sequences. In the whole-body

conclusionsWe demonstrated that the SimPET scanner has a high count rate performance and excellent spatial resolution. The combined SimPET/M7 enabled simultaneous PET/MR imaging studies with no remarkable mutual interference between the two imaging modalities.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyAlgorithmsAnimalsImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMice, Inbred C57BLPhantoms, ImagingNEMA performancePET/MRISimultaneous imaging

Identifiers

PMID32285357
OpenAlexW3015568659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.