Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32285333›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2020

Personalization of Endoscopic Bariatric and Metabolic Therapies Based on Physiology: a Prospective Feasibility Study with a Single Fluid-Filled Intragastric Balloon.

Gontrand Lopez-Nava, Veeravich Jaruvongvanich, Andrew C Storm, Daniel B Maselli, Inmaculada Bautista-Castaño, Eric J Vargas, Reem Matar, Andres Acosta, Barham K Abu Dayyeh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Precision Medicine in Bariatric Procedures.Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Precision Medicine and Obesity.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Precision Medicine for Obesity.Digestive disease interventions · 2021
    Article
  10. Endoscopic Procedures for Weight Loss.Current obesity reports · 2021
    Review
  11. Six intragastric balloons: Which to choose?World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gontrand Lopez-NavaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sanchinarro University Hospital of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Veeravich JaruvongvanichDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Andrew C StormDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Daniel B MaselliDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Inmaculada Bautista-CastañoDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sanchinarro University Hospital of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Eric J VargasDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Reem MatarDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Andres AcostaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Barham K Abu DayyehDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. AbuDayyeh.Barham@mayo.edu.
Mayo Clinic · USHospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe intragastric balloon (IGB) is commonly used for weight loss. Identifying patients who are most likely to tolerate and benefit from IGB therapy will optimize outcomes. Our aims were to prospectively utilize a gastric emptying study to predict intolerance and treatment response with a single fluid-filled IGB and to develop a physiologic prediction model with a treatment algorithm. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 32 patients had a gastric emptying study before and 2-3 months after placement of an IGB. Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to calculate likelihood ratios and to develop a physiologic prediction model.

resultsPatients in the higher gastric retention quartile at baseline had a 6.2-time higher likelihood ratio for early balloon removal secondary to intolerance (p = 0.013). Utilizing baseline gastric emptying to predict intolerance to the IGB may have prevented 75% of early removal cases. Decreased gastric emptying at 3 months after balloon placement was significantly correlated with percent total body weight loss (%TWBL) at 6 and 12 months (p = 0.01 and p = 0.014, respectively). At 6 months after IGB, patients with no change in their gastric emptying at 3 months lost significantly less weight compared with those with increased gastric retention (median %TBWL = 9.0% [4.5-14.7] versus 17.3% [12.2-24.4], p = 0.016).

conclusionUtilizing gastric emptying as a physiologic predictor of intolerance and response to the single fluid-filled IGB can improve outcomes. This pilot feasibility trial ushers in the era of personalized endoscopic bariatric therapies to maximize patients' tolerance, cost-effectiveness, and meaningful weight loss.

Indexed as

BariatricsGastric BalloonObesity, MorbidFeasibility StudiesHumansProspective StudiesGastric emptyingIntoleranceIntragastric balloonObesityPersonalized medicineWeight loss

Identifiers

PMID32285333
OpenAlexW3016220705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.