Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32285316›Full record

ArticleTargeted oncology2020

Natural Killer Cells as a Potential Biomarker for Predicting Immunotherapy Efficacy in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Yong-Hee Cho, Myeong Geun Choi, Dong Ha Kim, Yun Jung Choi, Seon Ye Kim, Ki Jung Sung, Jae Cheol Lee, Sang-Yeob Kim, Jin Kyung Rho, Chang-Min Choi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Targeted oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Predictive value of peripheral blood CD4Frontiers in immunology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yong-Hee ChoAsan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Seoul, 05505, South Korea.
Myeong Geun ChoiDepartment of Pulmonology and Critical Care Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea.
Dong Ha KimAsan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Seoul, 05505, South Korea.
Yun Jung ChoiAsan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Seoul, 05505, South Korea.
Seon Ye KimAsan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Seoul, 05505, South Korea.
Ki Jung SungAsan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Seoul, 05505, South Korea.
Jae Cheol LeeDepartment of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Seoul, 05505, South Korea.
Sang-Yeob KimDepartment of Convergence Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea.
Jin Kyung RhoDepartment of Convergence Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea. jkrho@amc.seoul.kr.
Chang-Min ChoiDepartment of Pulmonology and Critical Care Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea. ccm@amc.seoul.kr.
Ulsan College · KRAsan Medical Center · KRUniversity of Ulsan · KR

Funding

Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center 2018-563National Research Foundation of Korea 2019R1A2C2006054
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has emerged as an important treatment option. Although immunotherapy may significantly improve survival and quality of life, response rates are as low as 20% in NSCLC patients.

objectiveThe identification of reliable biomarkers predicting response to immunotherapy is required urgently to determine patient selection guidelines. PATIENTS AND

methodsPeripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from nine NSCLC patients were collected pre- and post-treatment with immunotherapy. The immune cell composition of PBMCs was analyzed using CyTOF with an optimized 32-marker panel. The natural killer (NK) cell activity was assessed with the measurement of interferon (INF)-γ using an NK Vue™ kit.

resultsWe found that the percentages of NK cell populations in the immune cells of PBMCs were prominently elevated in the immunotherapy responder group when compared with non-responders. While no meaningful differences were observed in other populations of immune cells, consistent with these results, the overall activity of NK cells in responders was highly elevated compared with that of non-responders. From the analysis of NK subsets, although differences in the population of early NK cells were not observed, the functionally differentiated late NK cells were prominently high in responders.

conclusionsThe overall activity or number of NK cells may be a useful biomarker to predict immunotherapy response in patients with NSCLC.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungFemaleHumansImmunotherapyKiller Cells, NaturalLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesYoung AdultBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID32285316
OpenAlexW3015453478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.