ArticleTropical animal health and production2020
Nutritional status of grazing Lowline Angus crossbred supplemented with fermented cassava starch residue.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to compare growth performance of Lowline Angus crossbred with Thai native cattle under a grazing system with supplementation of fermented cassava starch residue. Three Ruzi grass sub-fields were used for twenty heads of beef cattle for a 7-month experiment from February to August 2017. Yeast, molasses, and urea-fermented cassava starch residue was offered at 1.50% BW of animal. Blood metabolite and fecal composition were determined for health and nutritional stage assessment. The temperature-humidity index was highest (75.6-84.6) in April. Overall growth rate of beef cattle was not significantly different among breeds except in the first month when the native had greater weight gain than the crossbred. Average daily gain was 353 and 345 g for Thai native and its crossbred with Lowline Angus, respectively. Blood triglyceride concentration sampled at 7 months of the native was higher than that of the crossbred; in contrast, blood cholesterol of the crossbred tended to be higher than that of the native. Other blood metabolites including glucose, cholesterol, urea nitrogen, creatinine, total protein, albumin, and globulin were comparable between breeds. The native and the crossbred were similar in fecal composition, ruminal fermentation end-products (ammonia nitrogen and volatile fatty acids), and microbial population. Therefore, under grazing condition with low-quality feed supplementation, Thai native beef cattle and its Lowline Angus crossbred had similar growth rate, health, and nutritional status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32285264What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.