Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32285262›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2020

Assessments used to measure participation in life activities in individuals with cancer: a scoping review.

Allison J L'Hotta, Taniya E Varughese, Kathleen D Lyons, Laura Simon, Allison A King

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Trajectories of participation in daily life among individuals newly diagnosed with cancer: A 5-month longitudinal study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  10. Perspectives of Participation in Daily Life From Cancer Survivors: A Qualitative Analysis.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Allison J L'HottaWashington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA. alhotta@wustl.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7825-2492
Taniya E VarugheseWashington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7300-6986
Kathleen D LyonsDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Lebanon, NH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8895-4612
Laura SimonWashington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3760-6810
Allison A KingWashington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1951-6176

Funding

(SCANS) Sickle Cell Anemia Neurodevelopmental Screening - Mentoring and Research in Patient Oriented ResearchK24HL148305 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Allison A King · 2019 to 2026
$706k
NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL148305
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIndividuals with cancer are at high risk for restricted participation in meaningful life activities such as work, school, and social activities. Evaluating participation in life activities is identified as a critical component of rehabilitation referral and triage systems. This scoping review investigates what assessments are used to measure participation in life activities in individuals with cancer.

methodsSix databases were systematically searched using keywords and controlled vocabulary through February 2020. Eligible studies used the term participation in the context of life situations and had an assessment with at least 5 participation-specific questions.

resultsA total of 4604 unique articles were identified and screened for eligibility. Thirty-two studies were included; 20 unique assessments of participation were identified. Assessments were developed with the primary purpose of measuring participation (n = 8); global or physical function (n = 9); community integration (n = 1); social activity (n = 1); or occupational gaps (n = 1). Most assessments (12/20) were not developed with the purpose of measuring participation and only 4 assessments measured key components of participation other than frequency.

conclusionMeasuring participation in life activities is a developing area in oncology research. Most studies do not accurately or comprehensively measure this construct. The heterogeneity in assessments used indicates no clear consensus on a gold-standard participation measure for use among cancer survivors. Comprehensively measuring participation will help identify individuals in need of rehabilitation services and is an essential first step to inform the development of targeted interventions to enhance participation.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingCancer SurvivorsHumansNeoplasmsCancer careMeasurementParticipationRehabilitationSurvivorship

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.