ReviewCurrent osteoporosis reports2020
New Developments in Fracture Risk Assessment for Current Osteoporosis Reports.
Review in Current osteoporosis reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Guidelines for fracture risk assessment and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and men above the age of 50 in Qatar.Archives of osteoporosis · 2024Guideline
- The Analysis for Anemia Increasing Fracture Risk.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2020Pooled it
- Assessment of Osteoporotic Fracture Risk in Patients above 50 Years Using Quantitative Ultrasonography and Fracture Risk Assessment Tool: A Cross-sectional Study.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Article
- Osteoporosis: The Renascent Impact of Vertebral Fractures-A Narrative Review of Diagnosis, Risk Stratification, and Integrated Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Comprehensive clinical review of osteoporosis in older adults: Diagnosis, management, and a UAE primary care perspective.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2026Review
- Development and validation of a multimodal interpretable machine learning model for the identification of osteoporosis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a multicenter retrospective study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Social vulnerability index enhances FRAX prediction of hip fractures in fall patients.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a predictive model for vertebral fracture risk in osteoporosis patients.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024Article
- Association between advanced lung cancer inflammation index and osteoporosis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: evidence from NHANES.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
- Review
- A Fracture Risk Assessment Tool for High Resolution Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2023Article
- Oxidative Stress and Natural Antioxidants in Osteoporosis: Novel Preventive and Therapeutic Approaches.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Hemoglobin level and osteoporosis in Chinese elders with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Nutrition & diabetes · 2022Article
- Application and prospect of trabecular bone score in differentiated thyroid cancer patients receiving thyrotropin suppression therapy.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Review
- Osteoporosis in Patients With Respiratory Diseases.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Review
- Finite Element Assessment of Bone Fragility from Clinical Images.Current osteoporosis reports · 2021Review
- Lower Serum Irisin Levels Are Associated with Increased Osteoporosis and Oxidative Stress in Postmenopausal.Reports of biochemistry & molecular biology · 2021Article
- Bone Phenotyping Approaches in Human, Mice and Zebrafish - Expert Overview of the EU Cost Action GEMSTONE ("GEnomics of MusculoSkeletal traits TranslatiOnal NEtwork").Frontiers in endocrinology · 2021Review
- FRAX: re-adjust or re-think.Archives of osteoporosis · 2020Review
- Use of Clinical Practice Guidelines and Quality Metrics to Assess Primary Care Management of Osteoporosis.Gerontology & geriatric medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewIdentifying individuals at high fracture risk can be used to target those likely to derive the greatest benefit from treatment. This narrative review examines recent developments in using specific risk factors used to assess fracture risk, with a focus on publications in the last 3 years. RECENT
findingsThere is expanding evidence for the recognition of individual clinical risk factors and clinical use of composite scores in the general population. Unfortunately, enthusiasm is dampened by three pragmatic randomized trials that raise questions about the effectiveness of widespread population screening using clinical fracture prediction tools given suboptimal participation and adherence. There have been refinements in risk assessment in special populations: men, patients with diabetes, and secondary causes of osteoporosis. New evidence supports the value of vertebral fracture assessment (VFA), high resolution peripheral quantitative CT (HR-pQCT), opportunistic screening using CT, skeletal strength assessment with finite element analysis (FEA), and trabecular bone score (TBS). The last 3 years have seen important developments in the area of fracture risk assessment, both in the research setting and translation to clinical practice. The next challenge will be incorporating these advances into routine work flows that can improve the identification of high risk individuals at the population level and meaningfully impact the ongoing crisis in osteoporosis management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.