Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32285241›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2020

Lymphovascular invasion in breast cancer is associated with gene expression signatures of cell proliferation but not lymphangiogenesis or immune response.

Mariko Asaoka, Santosh K Patnaik, Frank Zhang, Takashi Ishikawa, Kazuaki Takabe

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Genomic spectra of lymphovascular invasion in breast cancer.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The ambivalent nature of the relationship between lymphatics and cancer.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mariko AsaokaDepartment of Breast Surgery, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Santosh K PatnaikDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Frank ZhangGiesel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA.
Takashi IshikawaDepartment of Breast Surgery and Oncology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuaki TakabeDepartment of Breast Surgery, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA. kazuaki.takabe@roswellpark.org.
Tokyo Medical University · JPDartmouth College · USRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

Summer Research Experiences in Quantitative Cancer Sciences and Emerging TechnologiesR25CA181003 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI PAMELA A HERSHBERGER, Mukund Seshadri · 2014 to 2026
$3.3M
Sphingosine-1 Phosphate in Breast Cancer Progression and LymphangiogenesisR01CA160688 · NCI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI TAKABE, KAZUAKI · 2012 to 2016
$1.5M
Foundation for the National Institutes of Health R01CA160688Foundation for the National Institutes of Health R25CA181003NCI NIH HHS R01 CA160688NCI NIH HHS R25 CA181003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile the prognostic relevance of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in breast cancer is well known, its molecular biology is poorly understood. We hypothesized that pathologically determined LVI reflects molecular features of tumors and can be discerned from their genomic and transcriptomic profiles.

methodsLVI status and Nottingham histological scores of primary breast tumors of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project were assessed from pathology reports; other clinical and molecular data were obtained from TCGA data portals and publications. Two independent datasets (GSE5460 and GSE7849) were combined and used for validation.

resultsLVI status was determinable for 639 and 196 cases of the TCGA and validation cohorts, among whom LVI incidence was 37.8% and 37.2%, respectively. LVI was associated with high tumor Ki67 expression, advanced pathologic stage, and high Nottingham scores. LVI-positive cases had worse overall and progression-free survival regardless of cancer subtype. Surprisingly, in both cohorts, LVI was not associated with lymphangiogenesis or lymphatic vessel density as estimated from tumor expression of lymphatic endothelium-associated genes. LVI-positive tumors had higher genome copy number aberrations, aneuploidy, and homologous recombination defects, but not single-nucleotide variations or intra-tumor genome heterogeneity. Tumor immune cell composition and cytolytic activity was not associated with LVI status. On the other hand, expression of cell proliferation-related genes was significantly increased in LVI-positive tumors.

conclusionOur study suggests that breast cancer with LVI is a highly proliferative cancer, and it does not correlate with gene expression markers for lymphangiogenesis or immune response.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansLymphangiogenesisLymphatic VesselsNeoplasm InvasivenessPrognosisSurvival RateTranscriptomeBiomarkers, TumorBreast cancerCell proliferationLymphatic invasionLymphovascular invasionTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID32285241
PMCPMC7269116
OpenAlexW3015915243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.