Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32285225›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO2020

Noise-Induced Changes of the Auditory Brainstem Response to Speech-a Measure of Neural Desynchronisation?

Jessica de Boer, Helen E Nuttall, Katrin Krumbholz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jessica de BoerHearing Sciences, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Science Road, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. Jessica.deBoer@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-6666-7623
Helen E NuttallDepartment of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8497-5603
Katrin KrumbholzHearing Sciences, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Science Road, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8297-2628

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U135097128Medical Research Council MC_UU_00010/2Medical Research Council MR/S003320/1Medical Research Council (UK) MC_U135097128Medical Research Council (UK) MC_UU_00010/2Medical Research Council (UK) MR/S003320/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is commonly assumed that difficulty in listening to speech in noise is at least partly due to deficits in neural temporal processing. Given that noise reduces the temporal fidelity of the auditory brainstem response (ABR) to speech, it has been suggested that the speech ABR may serve as an index of such neural deficits. However, the temporal fidelity of ABRs, to both speech and non-speech sounds, is also known to be influenced by the cochlear origin of the response, as responses from higher-frequency cochlear regions are faster and more synchronous than responses from lower-frequency regions. Thus, if noise caused a reweighting of response contributions from higher- to lower-frequency cochlear regions, the temporal fidelity of the aggregate response should be reduced even in the absence of any changes in neural processing. This 'place mechanism' has been demonstrated for non-speech ABRs. The aim of this study was to test whether it also applies to speech ABRs. We used the so-called 'derived-band' method to isolate response contributions from frequency-limited cochlear regions. Broadband and derived-band speech ABRs were measured both in quiet and in noise. Whilst the noise caused significant changes to the temporal properties of the broadband response, its effects on the derived-band responses were mostly restricted to the response amplitudes. Importantly, the amplitudes of the higher-frequency derived-band responses were much more strongly affected than those of the lower-frequency responses, suggesting that the noise indeed caused a reweighting effect. Our results indicate that, as for non-speech ABRs, the cochlear place mechanism can represent a potentially substantial confound to speech-ABR-in-noise measurements.

Indexed as

Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemNoiseAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleSpeech PerceptionYoung Adultauditory temporal processingcochlear dispersioncomplex-ABR (cABR)speech-in-noise difficultysubcortical auditory-evoked potentials

Identifiers

PMID32285225
PMCPMC7271295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.