Observational studyLangenbeck's archives of surgery2020
Prospective study on predictability of complications by pancreatic surgeons.
Observational study in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe evaluated the intuition of expert pancreatic surgeons, in predicting the associated risk of pancreatic resection and compared this "intuition" to actual operative follow-up. The objective was to avoid major complications following pancreatic resection, which remains a challenge.
methodsFrom January 2015 to February 2018, all patients who were 18 years old or more undergoing a pancreatic resection (pancreaticoduodenectomy [PD], distal pancreatectomy [DP], or central pancreatectomy [CP]) for pancreatic lesions were included. Preoperatively and postoperatively, all surgeons completed a form assessing the expected potential occurrence of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF: grade B or C), postoperative hemorrhage, and length of stay.
resultsPreoperative intuition was assessed for 101 patients for 52 PD, 44 DP, and 5 CP cases. Overall mortality and morbidity rates were 6.9% (n = 7) and 67.3% (n = 68), respectively, and 38 patients (37.6%) developed a POPF, including 27 (26.7%) CR-POPF. Concordance between preoperative intuition of CR-POPF occurrence and reality was minimal, with a Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ) of 0.175 (P value = 0.009), and the same result was obtained between postoperative intuition and reality (κ = 0.351; P < 0.001). When the pancreatic parenchyma was hard, surgeons predicted the absence of CR-POPF with a negative predictive value of 91.3%. However, they were not able to predict the occurrence of CR-POPF when the pancreas was soft (positive predictive value 48%).
conclusionsThis study assessed for the first time the surgeon's intuition in pancreatic surgery, and demonstrated that pancreatic surgeons cannot accurately assess outcomes except when the pancreatic parenchyma is hard.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32285190What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.