ArticleEuropean journal of breast health2020
The Composite Planning Technique in Left Sided Breast Cancer Radiotherapy: A Dosimetric Study.
Article in European journal of breast health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this retrospective study is to reduce the dose of heart, both lung and opposite breast and left anterior descending artery (LAD) and avoid long term complication and radiation induced secondary malignancies in radiotherapy left breast/chest wall without losing homogeneity and conformity of the Planning Target Volume (PTV), contoured using Radiotherapy Oncology Group (RTOG 1005) guideline. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe treatment plans were generated retrospectively by TFIF, VMAT and Composite techniques for 30 patients. Dose-Volume Histograms (DVHs) were evaluated for PTV and organs at risk (OAR's) and analyzed in two groups BCS and MRM using Wilcoxon signed rank test.
resultsThe homogeneity index (HI) was improved in Composite technique by 32.72% and 21.81% of VMAT, 50.66% and 49.41% of TFIF in BCS and MRM group respectively. The Conformity Index (CI) for composite plan was statistically same as VMAT and superior by 27.94% and 41.37% of TFIF in BCS and MRM group respectively. The low dose volume V
conclusionThe Composite plan consisting of VMAT and TFIF plan with an optimum selection of fractions can achieve lower low dose exposure to the OAR's without compromising coverage compared to VMAT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.