Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32284982›Full record

ReviewScience advances2020

Quantum biology revisited.

Jianshu Cao, Richard J Cogdell, David F Coker, Hong-Guang Duan, Jürgen Hauer, Ulrich Kleinekathöfer, Thomas L C Jansen, Tomáš Mančal, R J Dwayne Miller, Jennifer P Ogilvie and 8 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Science advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 116 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
116citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

116 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Excitonic energy transfer in red algal Photosystem I reveals an evolutionary bridge between cyanobacteria and plants.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Quantum Nanomedicine and Quantum Biomaterials.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Quantum biology: From mechanisms to medicine.Clinical and translational medicine · 2026
    Review
  13. What is quantum biology?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. An Open-Quantum-Systems Theory of Quantum-Biological Communication Channels.IEEE transactions on molecular, biological, and multi-scale communications · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

56 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Jianshu CaoDepartment of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7616-7809
Richard J CogdellInstitute of Molecular, Cell and Systems Biology, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Science, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK.
David F CokerDepartment of Chemistry, Boston University, 590 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6210-5228
Hong-Guang DuanAtomically Resolved Dynamics Department, Max Planck Institute for the Structure and Dynamics of Matter, 22761 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6589-0890
Jürgen HauerTechnische Universität München, Dynamische Spektroskopien, Fakultät für Chemie, Lichtenbergstr. 4, 85748 Garching, Germany, and Photonics Institute, TU Wien, 1040 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6874-6138
Ulrich KleinekathöferDepartment of Physics and Earth Science, Jacobs University Bremen, Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6114-7431
Thomas L C JansenZernike Institute for Advanced Materials, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6066-6080
Tomáš MančalFaculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, Ke Karlovu 5, CZ-12116 Prague 2, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-1736-3054
R J Dwayne MillerAtomically Resolved Dynamics Department, Max Planck Institute for the Structure and Dynamics of Matter, 22761 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0884-0541
Jennifer P OgilvieDepartment of Physics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48108, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4060-5437
Valentyn I ProkhorenkoAtomically Resolved Dynamics Department, Max Planck Institute for the Structure and Dynamics of Matter, 22761 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1363-2213
Thomas RengerInstitute of Theoretical Physics, Department of Theoretical Biophysics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Altenberger Str. 69, 4040 Linz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-9245-3805
Howe-Siang TanDivision of Chemistry and Biological Chemistry, School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, 21 Nanyang Link, Singapore 637371, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-2523-106X
Roel TempelaarDepartment of Chemistry, Columbia University, 3000 Broadway, New York, NY 10027, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0786-7304
Michael ThorwartI. Institut für Theoretische Physik, Universität Hamburg, Jungiusstrasse 9, 20355 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5837-0835
Erling ThyrhaugTechnische Universität München, Dynamische Spektroskopien, Fakultät für Chemie, Lichtenbergstr. 4, 85748 Garching, Germany, and Photonics Institute, TU Wien, 1040 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8634-9606
Sebastian WestenhoffDepartment of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg 40530, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6961-8015
Donatas ZigmantasChemical Physics, Box 124, Lund University, 22100 Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2007-5256

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Photosynthesis is a highly optimized process from which valuable lessons can be learned about the operating principles in nature. Its primary steps involve energy transport operating near theoretical quantum limits in efficiency. Recently, extensive research was motivated by the hypothesis that nature used quantum coherences to direct energy transfer. This body of work, a cornerstone for the field of quantum biology, rests on the interpretation of small-amplitude oscillations in two-dimensional electronic spectra of photosynthetic complexes. This Review discusses recent work reexamining these claims and demonstrates that interexciton coherences are too short lived to have any functional significance in photosynthetic energy transfer. Instead, the observed long-lived coherences originate from impulsively excited vibrations, generally observed in femtosecond spectroscopy. These efforts, collectively, lead to a more detailed understanding of the quantum aspects of dissipation. Nature, rather than trying to avoid dissipation, exploits it via engineering of exciton-bath interaction to create efficient energy flow.

Indexed as

Energy TransferPhotosynthesisQuantum TheoryAlgorithmsLight-Harvesting Protein ComplexesModels, TheoreticalSpectrum AnalysisLight-Harvesting Protein Complexes

Identifiers

PMID32284982
PMCPMC7124948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.