Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32284940›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2020

Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment of Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures: A Pilot Economic Decision Analysis.

Alvin W Su, Ljiljana Bogunovic, Jeffrey Johnson, Sandra Klein, Matthew J Matava, Jeremy McCormick, Matthew V Smith, Rick W Wright, Robert H Brophy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alvin W SuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Ljiljana BogunovicDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Jeffrey JohnsonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Sandra KleinDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Matthew J MatavaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Jeremy McCormickDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Matthew V SmithDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Rick W WrightDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Robert H BrophyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe operative treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures has been associated with lower rerupture rates and better function but also a risk of surgery-related complications compared with nonoperative treatment, which may provide improved outcomes with accelerated rehabilitation protocols. However, economic decision analyses integrating the updated costs of both treatment options are limited in the literature. PURPOSE: To compare the cost-effectiveness of operative and nonoperative treatment of acute Achilles tendon tears. STUDY

designEconomic and decision analysis; Level of evidence, 2.

methodsAn economic decision model was built to assess the cost-utility ratio (CUR) of open primary repair versus nonoperative treatment for acute Achilles tendon ruptures, based on direct costs from the practices of sports medicine and foot and ankle surgeons at a single tertiary academic center, with published outcome probabilities and patient utility data. Multiway sensitivity analyses were performed to reflect the range of data.

resultsNonoperative treatment was more cost-effective in the average scenario (nonoperative CUR, US$520; operative CUR, US$1995), but crossover occurred during the sensitivity analysis (nonoperative CUR range, US$224-US$2079; operative CUR range, US$789-US$8380). Operative treatment cost an extra average marginal CUR of US$1475 compared with nonoperative treatment, assuming uneventful healing in both treatment arms. The sensitivity analysis demonstrated a decreased marginal CUR of operative treatment when the outcome utility was maximized, and rerupture rates were minimized compared with nonoperative treatment.

conclusionNonoperative treatment was more cost-effective in average scenarios. Crossover indicated that open primary repair would be favorable for maximized outcome utility, such as that for young athletes or heavy laborers. The treatment decision for acute Achilles tendon ruptures should be individualized. These pilot results provide inferences for further longitudinal analyses incorporating future clinical evidence.

Indexed as

Achilles tendoncost-effectivenessdecision analysis

Identifiers

PMID32284940
PMCPMC7139191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.