ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2020
CrossFit and the Epidemiology of Musculoskeletal Injuries: A Prospective 12-Week Cohort Study.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Which resistance training is safest to practice? A systematic review.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Pooled it
- Risk Factors for Musculoskeletal Injury in CrossFit: A Systematic Review.International journal of sports medicine · 2023Pooled it
- From Performance to Health: A Global Scientometric Analysis of the Evolution of CrossFit Research.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Common Injuries Across Baseline, 6-Month, and 12-Month Assessments in CrossFitSports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Ultrasound-Based Morphological and Functional Assessment in Male CrossFit Athletes with Unilateral Subacromial Shoulder Pain: An Observational Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Observational
- Demographic, Epidemiological and Functional Profile Models of Greek CrossFit Athletes in Relation to Shoulder Injuries: A Prospective Study.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025Article
- Comparison of Temporomandibular Disorder Signs and Symptoms in CrossFitInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Sport-Related Injuries in Portuguese CrossFitMuscles (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- An injury profile of musculoskeletal injuries in CrossFit athletes in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.South African journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- From Sweat to Strain: An Epidemiological Analysis of Training-Related Injuries in CrossFitOpen access journal of sports medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Popular Gym Fitness Sport: An Analysis of 1387 Recreational Athletes Regarding Prone to Pain Exercises and the Corresponding Localisations.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A Muscle Load Feedback Application for Strength Training: A Proof-of-Concept Study.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Epidemiological Profile among Greek CrossFit Practitioners.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Trunk, Mass Grasp, Knee, and Hip Muscle Performance in CrossFit Participants: Reference Values According to Participants' Sex and Limb Dominance.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2023Article
- Upper Extremity Injuries in CrossFit Athletes-a Review of the Current Literature.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2022Review
- Supraspinatus repair and biceps tenodesis in competitive CrossFit athletes allow for a 100% of return to sport.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2021Article
- Injury Profile Among Street Workout Practitioners.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2021Article
- An Analysis of Sport-Specific Pain Symptoms through Inter-Individual Training Differences in CrossFit.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite the increasing international popularity of CrossFit, there is a paucity of scientific evidence on the risk of CrossFit-related musculoskeletal injuries (CRMIs). PURPOSE: To investigate the incidence (cumulative incidence proportion [IP] and incidence density [ID]) of CRMIs and the association of CRMIs with personal and training characteristics. STUDY
designDescriptive epidemiology study.
methodsA prospective, 12-week descriptive epidemiology cohort study was conducted in a convenience sample of CrossFit facilities in a single Brazilian city. Printed baseline questionnaires were distributed to 13 CrossFit boxes. All participants who filled out the questionnaire and consented to participate in the study were invited to respond to an online follow-up questionnaire every 2 weeks to collect data on CrossFit training characteristics and CRMIs. A CRMI was defined as any self-reported musculoskeletal injury or pain that prevented an athlete from exercising for at least 1 day. The IP was defined as the number of new cases divided by the entire population at risk, while the ID was defined as new events divided by the total person-time exposure in hours. Logistic mixed models were developed to investigate the association of CRMIs with personal and training characteristics.
resultsA total of 515 CrossFit participants filled out the baseline questionnaire and provided informed consent, and 406 (78.8%) completed at least 1 follow-up measure. There were 133 participants who reported at least 1 CRMI during the study, and a total of 247 unique and new CRMIs were reported over a total estimated person-time exposure to CrossFit of 13,041 hours. The IP was 32.8% (95% CI, 28.4%-37.5%). The ID was 18.9 (95% CI, 16.6-21.3) per 1000 hours of CrossFit exposure. The shoulders (19.0%; n = 47) and lumbar spine (15.0%; n = 37) were most affected. Muscle injuries (45.3%; n = 112) and joint pain (24.7%; n = 61) were the most common CRMI types reported. Switching between prescribed and scaled down training loads (odds ratio [OR], 3.5 [95% CI, 1.7-7.3]) and previous injuries (OR, 3.2 [95% CI, 1.4-7.7]) were risk factors for a CRMI, while CrossFit experience was identified as a protective factor (OR, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.5-1.0]).
conclusionIn this 12-week prospective study, the ID was 18.9 CRMIs per 1000 hours of exposure; switching between training loads and previous injuries was associated with 3.5- and 3.2-fold higher odds, respectively, of sustaining CRMIs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.