Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32284938›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2020

CrossFit and the Epidemiology of Musculoskeletal Injuries: A Prospective 12-Week Cohort Study.

Paulo Roberto de Queiroz Szeles, Taline Santos da Costa, Ronaldo Alves da Cunha, Luiz Hespanhol, Alberto de Castro Pochini, Leonardo Addeo Ramos, Moises Cohen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Which resistance training is safest to practice? A systematic review.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Comparison of Temporomandibular Disorder Signs and Symptoms in CrossFitInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  8. Sport-Related Injuries in Portuguese CrossFitMuscles (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Epidemiological Profile among Greek CrossFit Practitioners.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Supraspinatus repair and biceps tenodesis in competitive CrossFit athletes allow for a 100% of return to sport.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2021
    Article
  19. Injury Profile Among Street Workout Practitioners.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Paulo Roberto de Queiroz SzelesDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology and Postgraduate Program in Sports Science, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Taline Santos da CostaDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology and Postgraduate Program in Sports Science, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ronaldo Alves da CunhaDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology and Postgraduate Program in Sports Science, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luiz HespanholMaster's and Doctoral Programs in Physical Therapy, City University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Alberto de Castro PochiniDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology and Postgraduate Program in Sports Science, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Leonardo Addeo RamosDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology and Postgraduate Program in Sports Science, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Moises CohenDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology and Postgraduate Program in Sports Science, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the increasing international popularity of CrossFit, there is a paucity of scientific evidence on the risk of CrossFit-related musculoskeletal injuries (CRMIs). PURPOSE: To investigate the incidence (cumulative incidence proportion [IP] and incidence density [ID]) of CRMIs and the association of CRMIs with personal and training characteristics. STUDY

designDescriptive epidemiology study.

methodsA prospective, 12-week descriptive epidemiology cohort study was conducted in a convenience sample of CrossFit facilities in a single Brazilian city. Printed baseline questionnaires were distributed to 13 CrossFit boxes. All participants who filled out the questionnaire and consented to participate in the study were invited to respond to an online follow-up questionnaire every 2 weeks to collect data on CrossFit training characteristics and CRMIs. A CRMI was defined as any self-reported musculoskeletal injury or pain that prevented an athlete from exercising for at least 1 day. The IP was defined as the number of new cases divided by the entire population at risk, while the ID was defined as new events divided by the total person-time exposure in hours. Logistic mixed models were developed to investigate the association of CRMIs with personal and training characteristics.

resultsA total of 515 CrossFit participants filled out the baseline questionnaire and provided informed consent, and 406 (78.8%) completed at least 1 follow-up measure. There were 133 participants who reported at least 1 CRMI during the study, and a total of 247 unique and new CRMIs were reported over a total estimated person-time exposure to CrossFit of 13,041 hours. The IP was 32.8% (95% CI, 28.4%-37.5%). The ID was 18.9 (95% CI, 16.6-21.3) per 1000 hours of CrossFit exposure. The shoulders (19.0%; n = 47) and lumbar spine (15.0%; n = 37) were most affected. Muscle injuries (45.3%; n = 112) and joint pain (24.7%; n = 61) were the most common CRMI types reported. Switching between prescribed and scaled down training loads (odds ratio [OR], 3.5 [95% CI, 1.7-7.3]) and previous injuries (OR, 3.2 [95% CI, 1.4-7.7]) were risk factors for a CRMI, while CrossFit experience was identified as a protective factor (OR, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.5-1.0]).

conclusionIn this 12-week prospective study, the ID was 18.9 CRMIs per 1000 hours of exposure; switching between training loads and previous injuries was associated with 3.5- and 3.2-fold higher odds, respectively, of sustaining CRMIs.

Indexed as

epidemiologyhigh-intensity interval traininglongitudinal studiesrisk factorssports injury

Identifiers

PMID32284938
PMCPMC7137139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.