Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32284875›Full record

ArticleMultiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical

Evaluation of the 'ring sign' and the 'core sign' as a magnetic resonance imaging marker of disease activity and progression in clinically isolated syndrome and early multiple sclerosis.

Nelly Blindenbacher, Eveline Brunner, Susanna Asseyer, Michael Scheel, Nadja Siebert, Ludwig Rasche, Judith Bellmann-Strobl, Alexander Brandt, Klemens Ruprecht, Dominik Meier and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Longitudinal clinical study of patients with iron rim lesions in multiple sclerosis.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nelly Blindenbacherqbig, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Switzerland.
Eveline Brunnerqbig, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4617-2989
Susanna AsseyerNeurocure Clinical Research Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6289-1791
Michael ScheelNeurocure Clinical Research Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.
Nadja SiebertNeurocure Clinical Research Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.
Ludwig RascheNeurocure Clinical Research Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.
Judith Bellmann-StroblNeurocure Clinical Research Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.
Alexander BrandtNeurocure Clinical Research Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9768-014X
Klemens RuprechtDepartment of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.
Dominik Meierqbig, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Switzerland.
Jens Wuerfelqbig, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Switzerland.
Friedemann PaulNeurocure Clinical Research Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.
Tim Sinneckerqbig, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Switzerland.
Max Delbrück Center · DEUniversity of Basel · CHCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBrain lesions with a hypointense ring or core were described in multiple sclerosis on susceptibility weighted imaging.

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to study the evolution and prognostic relevance of susceptibility weighted imaging hypointense lesions in clinically isolated syndrome and early multiple sclerosis.

methodsSixty-six early multiple sclerosis and clinically isolated syndrome patients were followed over a median period of 2.9 years (range 1.6-4.6 years) and underwent 3T magnetic resonance imaging including 3D susceptibility weighted imaging and T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery. We assessed the presence of susceptibility weighted imaging hypointense core or ring lesions, and Expanded Disability Status Scale at baseline and follow-up.

resultsOf 611 lesions at baseline, 64 (10.5%) had a susceptibility weighted imaging hypointense core, and 28 (4.6%) had a susceptibility weighted imaging hypointense ring. Hypointense ring lesions were larger (

conclusionIn our cohort of patients with clinically isolated syndrome or early multiple sclerosis, susceptibility weighted imaging hypointense ring lesions were only rarely detectable, but did not shrink and were associated with future disability progression.

Indexed as

3 Tesla MRIclinically isolated syndromeMultiple sclerosisring signsusceptibility weighted imaging

Identifiers

PMID32284875
PMCPMC7132556
OpenAlexW3014367256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.