Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32284651›Full record

ArticleBulletin of the World Health Organization2020

Ethical dilemmas posed by mobile health and machine learning in psychiatry research.

Nicholas C Jacobson, Kate H Bentley, Ashley Walton, Shirley B Wang, Rebecca G Fortgang, Alexander J Millner, Garth Coombs, Alexandra M Rodman, Daniel D L Coppersmith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A shift in psychiatry through AI? Ethical challenges.Annals of general psychiatry · 2023
    Article
  13. Capturing mood dynamics through adolescent smartphone social communication.Journal of psychopathology and clinical science · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Technology-Based Mental Health Interventions for Domestic Violence Victims Amid COVID-19.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nicholas C JacobsonDepartment of Biomedical Data Science and Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Suite 300, Office # 333S, 46 Centerra Parkway, Lebanon, NH 03766, United States of America (USA).
Kate H BentleyDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital-Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, USA.
Ashley WaltonDepartment of Statistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA.
Shirley B WangDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA.
Rebecca G FortgangDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA.
Alexander J MillnerDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA.
Garth CoombsDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA.
Alexandra M RodmanDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA.
Daniel D L CoppersmithDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA.

Funding

Treatment Development & Evaluation CoreP30DA029926 · NIDA · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Lisa A. Marsch · 2011 to 2026
$21.5M
NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA029926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of digital technology to psychiatry research is rapidly leading to new discoveries and capabilities in the field of mobile health. However, the increase in opportunities to passively collect vast amounts of detailed information on study participants coupled with advances in statistical techniques that enable machine learning models to process such information has raised novel ethical dilemmas regarding researchers' duties to: (i) monitor adverse events and intervene accordingly; (ii) obtain fully informed, voluntary consent; (iii) protect the privacy of participants; and (iv) increase the transparency of powerful, machine learning models to ensure they can be applied ethically and fairly in psychiatric care. This review highlights emerging ethical challenges and unresolved ethical questions in mobile health research and provides recommendations on how mobile health researchers can address these issues in practice. Ultimately, the hope is that this review will facilitate continued discussion on how to achieve best practice in mobile health research within psychiatry.

Indexed as

Ethics, ResearchPsychiatryInformed ConsentMachine LearningPrivacyTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID32284651
PMCPMC7133483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.