Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32284583›Full record

ReviewNature ecology & evolution2020

Academic ecosystems must evolve to support a sustainable postdoc workforce.

Murielle Ålund, Nathan Emery, Benjamin J M Jarrett, Kirsty J MacLeod, Helen F McCreery, Nadya Mamoozadeh, John G Phillips, Jory Schossau, Andrew W Thompson, Alexa R Warwick and 3 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature ecology & evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Postdoc publications and citations link to academic retention and faculty success.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Collaborative consortia can boost postdoctoral workforce development.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Inclusion of Trainee Stakeholders Is Necessary for Effective Change in Health-Service-Psychology Internship Training.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Invisible University Is COVID-19 Positive.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Murielle Ålund *Department of Integrative Biology, Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology, and Behavior, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2861-9721
Nathan Emery *Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9766-8044
Benjamin J M JarrettDepartment of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2071-6076
Kirsty J MacLeodDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4901-3809
Helen F McCreerySchool of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3811-7960
Nadya MamoozadehDepartment of Integrative Biology, Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology, and Behavior, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1250-775X
John G PhillipsBEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3974-4309
Jory SchossauDepartment of Integrative Biology, Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology, and Behavior, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5085-2397
Andrew W ThompsonDepartment of Integrative Biology, Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology, and Behavior, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1198-6130
Alexa R WarwickBEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4701-1079
Kelsey M YuleBiodiversity Knowledge Integration Center, School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Erin R ZylstraDepartment of Integrative Biology, Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology, and Behavior, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2536-0403
Eben GeringDepartment of Integrative Biology, Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology, and Behavior, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA. egering@nova.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1270-6727

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The postdoctoral workforce comprises a growing proportion of the science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) community, and plays a vital role in advancing science. Postdoc professional development, however, remains rooted in outdated realities. We propose enhancements to postdoc-centred policies and practices to better align this career stage with contemporary job markets and work life. By facilitating productivity, wellness and career advancement, the proposed changes will benefit all stakeholders in postdoc success-including research teams, institutions, professional societies and the scientific community as a whole. To catalyse reform, we outline recommendations for (1) skills-based training tailored to the current career landscape, and (2) supportive policies and tools outlined in postdoc handbooks. We also invite the ecology and evolution community to lead further progressive reform.

Indexed as

EcosystemResearch PersonnelHumansWorkforce

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.