Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32284415›Full record

ReviewProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Coastal heritage, global climate change, public engagement, and citizen science.

Tom Dawson, Joanna Hambly, Alice Kelley, William Lees, Sarah Miller

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
69.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Evolving the narrative for protecting a rapidly changing ocean, post-COVID-19.Aquatic conservation : marine and freshwater ecosystems · 2021
    Article
  8. Leveraging legacy archaeological collections as proxies for climate and environmental research.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Review
  9. Archaeology, climate, and global change in the Age of Humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Tom DawsonSchool of History, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife KY16 9AL, Scotland; tcd@st-andrews.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-9229-7942
Joanna HamblySchool of History, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife KY16 9AL, Scotland.
Alice KelleyUniversity of Maine, Orono, ME 04473.ORCID 0000-0002-8977-1033
William LeesFlorida Public Archaeology Network, University of West Florida, Pensacola, FL 32502.
Sarah MillerFlorida Public Archaeology Network, Flagler College, St. Augustine, FL 32086.
University of St Andrews · GBFlagler College · USUniversity of Maine · USUniversity of West Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate change is threatening an uncalculated number of archaeological sites globally, totaling perhaps hundreds of thousands of culturally and paleoenvironmentally significant resources. As with all archaeological sites, they provide evidence of humanity's past and help us understand our place in the present world. Coastal sites, clustered at the water's edge, are already experiencing some of the most dramatic damage due to anthropogenic climate change, and the situation is predicted to worsen in the future. In the face of catastrophic loss, organizations around the world are developing new ways of working with this threatened coastal resource. This paper uses three examples from Scotland, Florida, and Maine to highlight how new partnerships and citizen science approaches are building communities of practice to better manage threatened coastal heritage. It compares methods on either side of the Atlantic and highlights challenges and solutions. The approaches are applicable to the increasing number of heritage sites everywhere at risk from climate change; the study of coastal sites thus helps society prepare for climate change impacts to heritage worldwide.

Indexed as

Citizen ScienceClimate ChangeArchaeologyConservation of Natural ResourcesFloridaHumansMaineScotlandarchaeologycitizen scienceclimate changecoastal heritageheritage management

Identifiers

PMID32284415
PMCPMC7165427
OpenAlexW3015450984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.