Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32284403›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Holographic virtual staining of individual biological cells.

Yoav N Nygate, Mattan Levi, Simcha K Mirsky, Nir A Turko, Moran Rubin, Itay Barnea, Gili Dardikman-Yoffe, Miki Haifler, Alon Shalev, Natan T Shaked

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. On the use of deep learning for phase recovery.Light, science & applications · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yoav N NygateFaculty of Engineering, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tel Aviv University, 6997801 Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-5800-9097
Mattan LeviFaculty of Engineering, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tel Aviv University, 6997801 Tel Aviv, Israel.
Simcha K MirskyFaculty of Engineering, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tel Aviv University, 6997801 Tel Aviv, Israel.
Nir A TurkoFaculty of Engineering, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tel Aviv University, 6997801 Tel Aviv, Israel.
Moran RubinFaculty of Engineering, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tel Aviv University, 6997801 Tel Aviv, Israel.
Itay BarneaFaculty of Engineering, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tel Aviv University, 6997801 Tel Aviv, Israel.
Gili Dardikman-YoffeFaculty of Engineering, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tel Aviv University, 6997801 Tel Aviv, Israel.
Miki HaiflerFaculty of Engineering, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tel Aviv University, 6997801 Tel Aviv, Israel.
Alon ShalevQART Medical, 4366236 Ra'anana, Israel.
Natan T ShakedFaculty of Engineering, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tel Aviv University, 6997801 Tel Aviv, Israel; nshaked@tau.ac.il.ORCID 0000-0003-4080-839X
Tel Aviv University · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many medical and biological protocols for analyzing individual biological cells involve morphological evaluation based on cell staining, designed to enhance imaging contrast and enable clinicians and biologists to differentiate between various cell organelles. However, cell staining is not always allowed in certain medical procedures. In other cases, staining may be time-consuming or expensive to implement. Staining protocols may be operator-sensitive, and hence may lead to varying analytical results, as well as cause artificial imaging artifacts or false heterogeneity. We present a deep-learning approach, called HoloStain, which converts images of isolated biological cells acquired without staining by holographic microscopy to their virtually stained images. We demonstrate this approach for human sperm cells, as there is a well-established protocol and global standardization for characterizing the morphology of stained human sperm cells for fertility evaluation, but, on the other hand, staining might be cytotoxic and thus is not allowed during human in vitro fertilization (IVF). After a training process, the deep neural network can take images of unseen sperm cells retrieved from holograms acquired without staining and convert them to their stainlike images. We obtained a fivefold recall improvement in the analysis results, demonstrating the advantage of using virtual staining for sperm cell analysis. With the introduction of simple holographic imaging methods in clinical settings, the proposed method has a great potential to become a common practice in human IVF procedures, as well as to significantly simplify and radically change other cell analyses and techniques such as imaging flow cytometry.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDeep LearningFlow CytometryHolographyHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMicroscopyNeural Networks, ComputerSpermatozoaStaining and Labelingbiological cell imagingdeep learningdigital holography

Identifiers

PMID32284403
PMCPMC7196795
OpenAlexW3015979632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.