Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32284401›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Viral zoonotic risk is homogenous among taxonomic orders of mammalian and avian reservoir hosts.

Nardus Mollentze, Daniel G Streicker

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 194 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
194citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
49.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

194 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 402 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Drivers of bat researchers' intent to adopt field hygiene practices.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

134 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nardus MollentzeMedical Research Council-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow G61 1QH, United Kingdom; nardus.mollentze@glasgow.ac.uk daniel.streicker@glasgow.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2452-6416
Daniel G StreickerMedical Research Council-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow G61 1QH, United Kingdom; nardus.mollentze@glasgow.ac.uk daniel.streicker@glasgow.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-7475-2705
MRC University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_19026Medical Research Council MC_UU_12014/12Medical Research Council MC_UU_12014/8Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 102507/Z/13/ZWellcome Trust 217221/Z/19/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The notion that certain animal groups disproportionately maintain and transmit viruses to humans due to broad-scale differences in ecology, life history, and physiology currently influences global health surveillance and research in disease ecology, virology, and immunology. To directly test whether such "special reservoirs" of zoonoses exist, we used literature searches to construct the largest existing dataset of virus-reservoir relationships, consisting of the avian and mammalian reservoir hosts of 415 RNA and DNA viruses along with their histories of human infection. Reservoir host effects on the propensity of viruses to have been reported as infecting humans were rare and when present were restricted to one or two viral families. The data instead support a largely host-neutral explanation for the distribution of human-infecting viruses across the animal orders studied. After controlling for higher baseline viral richness in mammals versus birds, the observed number of zoonoses per animal order increased as a function of their species richness. Animal orders of established importance as zoonotic reservoirs including bats and rodents were unexceptional, maintaining numbers of zoonoses that closely matched expectations for mammalian groups of their size. Our findings show that variation in the frequency of zoonoses among animal orders can be explained without invoking special ecological or immunological relationships between hosts and viruses, pointing to a need to reconsider current approaches aimed at finding and predicting novel zoonoses.

Indexed as

AnimalsBirdsCommunicable Diseases, EmergingDisease ReservoirsHumansMammalsRisk FactorsSpecies SpecificityVirus DiseasesZoonosesgeneralized additive modelinfectious diseasereservoirsurveillance

Identifiers

PMID32284401
PMCPMC7196766
OpenAlexW3016074853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.