Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32283726›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2020

Exposure-Response and Clinical Outcome Modeling of Inhaled Budesonide/Formoterol Combination in Asthma Patients.

Hyun-Moon Back, Jong Bong Lee, Anhye Kim, Seon-Jong Park, Junyeong Kim, Jung-Woo Chae, Seung Soo Sheen, Leonid Kagan, Hae-Sim Park, Young-Min Ye and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hyun-Moon BackDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA.
Jong Bong LeeDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA.
Anhye KimDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do, 13496, Korea.
Seon-Jong ParkCollege of Pharmacy, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, 34134, Korea.
Junyeong KimCollege of Pharmacy, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, 34134, Korea.
Jung-Woo ChaeCollege of Pharmacy, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, 34134, Korea.
Seung Soo SheenDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, 16499, Korea.
Leonid KaganDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA.
Hae-Sim ParkDepartment of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, 16499, Korea.
Young-Min YeDepartment of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, 16499, Korea.
Hwi-Yeol YunCollege of Pharmacy, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, 34134, Korea.

Funding

Korea Health Industry Development Institute HI16C0992Korea Health Industry Development Institute HI17C0970
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exposure-response and clinical outcome (CO) model for inhaled budesonide/formoterol was developed to quantify the relationship among pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) and CO of the drugs and evaluate the covariate effect on model parameters. Sputum eosinophils cationic proteins (ECP) and forced expiratory volume (FEV1) were selected as PD markers and asthma control score was used as a clinical outcome. One- and two-compartment models were used to describe the PK of budesonide and formoterol, respectively. The indirect response model (IDR) was used to describe the PD effect for ECP and FEV1. In addition, the symptomatic effect on the disease progression model for CO was connected with IDR on each PD response. The slope for the effect of ECP and FEV1 to disease progression were estimated as 0.00008 and 0.644, respectively. Total five covariates (ex. ADRB2 genotype etc.) were searched using a stepwise covariate modeling method, however, there was no significant covariate effect. The results from the simulation study were showed that a 1 puff b.i.d. had a comparable effect of asthma control with a 2 puff b.i.d. As a result, the 1 puff b.i.d. of combination drug could be suggested as a standardized dose to minimize the side effects and obtain desired control of disease compared to the 2 puff b.i.d.

Indexed as

asthma control testbudesonide/formoteroldose optimizationmoderate asthmapopulation analysis

Identifiers

PMID32283726
PMCPMC7238265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.