Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32283530›Full record

ArticleEBioMedicine2020

Artificial intelligence-assisted prediction of preeclampsia: Development and external validation of a nationwide health insurance dataset of the BPJS Kesehatan in Indonesia.

Herdiantri Sufriyana, Yu-Wei Wu, Emily Chia-Yu Su

Erratum issuedAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in EBioMedicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 35 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Prediction of hypertension and diabetes in twin pregnancy using machine learning model based on characteristics at first prenatal visit: national registry study.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. The Role of Digital Technology in Preventing Anemia Among Pregnant Women: A Scoping Review.International journal of telemedicine and applications · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Herdiantri SufriyanaGraduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan; Department of Medical Physiology, College of Medicine, University of Nahdlatul Ulama Surabaya, Surabaya 60237, Indonesia. Electronic address: herdiantrisufriyana@unusa.ac.id.
Yu-Wei WuDepartment of Medical Physiology, College of Medicine, University of Nahdlatul Ulama Surabaya, Surabaya 60237, Indonesia; Graduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan; Clinical Big Data Research Center, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 11031, Taiwan. Electronic address: yuwei.wu@tmu.edu.tw.
Emily Chia-Yu SuGraduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan; Clinical Big Data Research Center, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 11031, Taiwan; Research Center for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan. Electronic address: emilysu@tmu.edu.tw.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe developed and validated an artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted prediction of preeclampsia applied to a nationwide health insurance dataset in Indonesia.

methodsThe BPJS Kesehatan dataset have been preprocessed using a nested case-control design into preeclampsia/eclampsia (n = 3318) and normotensive pregnant women (n = 19,883) from all women with one pregnancy. The dataset provided 95 features consisting of demographic variables and medical histories started from 24 months to event and ended by delivery as the event. Six algorithms were compared by area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) with a subgroup analysis by time to the event. We compared our model to similar prediction models from systematically reviewed studies. In addition, we conducted a text mining analysis based on natural language processing techniques to interpret our modeling results.

findingsThe best model consisted of 17 predictors extracted by a random forest algorithm. Nine∼12 months to the event was the period that had the best AUROC in external validation by either geographical (0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88-0.89) or temporal split (0.86, 95% CI 0.85-0.86). We compared this model to prediction models in seven studies from 869 records in PUBMED, EMBASE, and SCOPUS. This model outperformed the previous models in terms of the precision, sensitivity, and specificity in all validation sets.

interpretationOur low-cost model improved preliminary prediction to decide pregnant women that will be predicted by the models with high specificity and advanced predictors.

fundingThis work was supported by grant no. MOST108-2221-E-038-018 from the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan.

Indexed as

Machine LearningModels, StatisticalAdultBlood PressureDemographyFemaleHumansIndonesiaMedical History TakingNational Health ProgramsPre-EclampsiaPregnancyArtificial intelligenceClinical prediction ruleHealth insurance datasetMachine learningNatural language processingPreeclampsia

Identifiers

PMID32283530
PMCPMC7152721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.