ArticleClinical neurology and neurosurgery2020
Long-term cognitive decline and mortality after carotid endarterectomy.
Article in Clinical neurology and neurosurgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo date no studies have evaluated long term cognitive decline after carotid endarterectomy (CEA). We evaluated whether participants who had CEA were at increased risk of cognitive decline over participants who didn't undergo CEA. PATIENTS AND
methodsThe patients in the study were participants in the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS), a study of 5201 men and women over the age of 65 who were recruited from four communities (Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Sacramento, California; Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Hagerstown, Maryland) in 1988-89. The outcomes measured were 1) Decline in 3MSE and digit symbol substitution test (DSST) scores after CEA compared to before CEA. 2) All-cause mortality in CHS cohort among participants who did and did not have CEA.
resultsCEA patients had significantly greater annual decrease in the DSST scores -2.43 (SD 4.21) compared to those who did not have a CEA -1.1 (SD 2.57) (p < 0.001) but this was not seen in the 3MSE scores. CEA patients had increased the risk of decline in DSST (OR 2.41, 95 % CI 1.49, 3.88) and 3MSE (OR 2.17, 95 % CI 1.35, 3.48) scores after adjusting for age, gender, race and educational status. CEA was associated with all-cause mortality in the long term with a HR of 2.72 (95 % CI 2.22, 3.34) after adjusting for covariates. Participants with lower baseline 3MSE scores HR 1.39 (1.27, 1.51), lower DSST scores <34 HR 1.69(1.54, 1.85) were more likely deceased.
conclusionsCEA patients are at increased risk of lower scores on 3MSE and DSST testing in the long term. Mortality in the CHS cohort was higher in participants who underwent CEA. Further, lower 3MSE and DSST scores increased the risk of mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.