Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32283352›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2020

Mental health disorders and adolescent peer relationships.

Emily Long, Maria Gardani, Mark McCann, Helen Sweeting, Mark Tranmer, Laurence Moore

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Homophily in friendship choice during an early life transition: A cohort network dynamic approach.Evolution and human behavior : official journal of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Mood Monitoring in Schools: A Promising Alternative to Single-Time-Point Screening.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The Structure of Social Support in Confidant Networks: Implications for Depression.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emily LongUniversity of Glasgow, School of Social and Political Sciences, MRC/CSO Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, 200 Renfield Street, Glasgow, G2 3AX, United Kingdom. Electronic address: Emily.Long@glasgow.ac.uk.
Maria GardaniUniversity of Glasgow, School of Psychology, 62 Hillhead Street, Glasgow, G12 8QB, United Kingdom.
Mark McCannUniversity of Glasgow, MRC/CSO Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, 200 Renfield Street, Glasgow, G2 3AX, United Kingdom.
Helen SweetingUniversity of Glasgow, MRC/CSO Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, 200 Renfield Street, Glasgow, G2 3AX, United Kingdom.
Mark TranmerUniversity of Glasgow, School of Social and Political Sciences, Adam Smith Building, Bute Gardens, Glasgow, G12 8RT, United Kingdom.
Laurence MooreUniversity of Glasgow, MRC/CSO Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, 200 Renfield Street, Glasgow, G2 3AX, United Kingdom.
MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office SPHSU11Chief Scientist Office SPHSU12Chief Scientist Office SPHSU14Chief Scientist Office SPHSU16Chief Scientist Office SPHSU18Medical Research Council MC_PC_13027Medical Research Council MC_UU_00022/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_00022/3Medical Research Council MC_UU_12017/11Medical Research Council MC_UU_12017/12Medical Research Council MC_UU12017/12Medical Research Council MC_UU_12017/14Medical Research Council MR/S015078/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleMental health disorders often arise during adolescence, with disruptive behavior disorders and anxiety disorders among the most common. Given the salience of peer relationships during adolescence, and research suggesting that mental health disorders negatively impact social functioning, this study uses novel methodology from social network analysis to uncover the social processes linking disruptive behavior disorders and anxiety disorders with adolescent friendships. In particular, the study focuses on peer withdrawal, peer popularity, and peer homophily in relation to both disorders.

methodsData come from 15-year old students in four Scottish secondary schools (N = 602). Diagnoses of disruptive behavior disorders and anxiety disorders were produced using the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children, and peer relationship data were obtained through a friendship nomination survey. Exponential random graph models were used to estimate the probability of peer withdrawal, peer popularity, and peer homophily based on each disorder.

resultsResults demonstrated that adolescents with disruptive behavior disorders were more popular than their peers without disruptive behavior disorders (OR: 1.47, CI: 1.20, 1.87). Friendship was also more likely between two adolescents both with or both without disruptive behavior disorders (OR: 1.26, CI: 1.07, 1.47), demonstrating peer homophily. There was no evidence that anxiety disorders were related to adolescent peer relationships.

conclusionsFindings from this study suggest that disruptive behavior disorders may be socially rewarded (e.g., peer popularity) and socially clustered (e.g., homophily), whereas anxiety disorders show no such trends. Thus, intervention efforts must account for the peer social status that may be gained from engaging in disruptive behavior during this developmental period. Further, given that similarity in DBD status is associated with an increased likelihood of friendship, adolescents are likely to be surrounded by peers who reinforce their behaviors.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorMental HealthAdolescentAnxiety DisordersChildFriendsHumansInterpersonal RelationsPeer GroupAdolescentsAnxiety disordersDisruptive behaviour disordersMental healthPeersSocial networks

Identifiers

PMID32283352
PMCPMC7248572
OpenAlexW3014922222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.