Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32283231›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology2020

Histologic features of melanoma associated with germline mutations of CDKN2A, CDK4, and POT1 in melanoma-prone families from the United States, Italy, and Spain.

Michael R Sargen, Donato Calista, David E Elder, Daniela Massi, Emily Y Chu, Míriam Potrony, Ruth M Pfeiffer, Cristina Carrera, Paula Aguilera, Llucia Alos and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Genomic ascertainment ofmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Michael R SargenClinical Genetics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland. Electronic address: michael.sargen@nih.gov.
Donato CalistaDepartment of Dermatology, Maurizio Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy.
David E ElderDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Daniela MassiSection of Pathological Anatomy, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Emily Y ChuDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Míriam PotronyMelanoma Unit, Dermatology Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Barcelona, Spain.
Ruth M PfeifferBiostatistics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland.
Cristina CarreraMelanoma Unit, Dermatology Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Barcelona, Spain.
Paula AguileraMelanoma Unit, Dermatology Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Barcelona, Spain.
Llucia AlosPathology Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Susana PuigMelanoma Unit, Dermatology Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Barcelona, Spain.
Rosalie ElenitsasDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Xiaohong R YangIntegrative Tumor Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland.
Margaret A TuckerHuman Genetics Program, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland.
Maria Teresa LandiIntegrative Tumor Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland.
Alisa M GoldsteinClinical Genetics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland.
National Institutes of Health · USHospital of the University of Pennsylvania · USHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESNational Cancer Institute · USUniversitat de Barcelona · ESCentre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases · ESOspedale “M. Bufalini” di Cesena · ITUniversity of Florence · IT

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCDKN2A, CDK4, and POT1 are well-established melanoma-susceptibility genes.

objectiveWe evaluated melanoma histopathology for individuals with germline mutations of CDKN2A, CDK4, and POT1.

methodsWe assessed histopathology for melanomas diagnosed in melanoma-prone families (≥2 individuals with melanoma) from the United States, Italy, and Spain. Comparisons between mutation carriers and noncarriers (no mutation) were adjusted for age, sex, Breslow depth, and correlations among individuals within the same family.

resultsHistologic slides were evaluated for 290 melanomas (139 from 132 noncarriers, 122 from 68 CDKN2A carriers, 10 from 6 CDK4 carriers, and 19 from 16 POT1 carriers). Superficial spreading was the predominant subtype for all groups. Spitzoid morphology (>25% of tumor) was observed in 10 of 15 invasive melanomas (67%) from POT1 carriers (P < .0001 vs noncarriers). This finding was independently confirmed by 3 expert melanoma dermatopathologists in 9 of 15 invasive melanomas (60%). In situ and invasive melanomas from CDKN2A and CDK4 carriers were histologically similar to melanomas from noncarriers. LIMITATIONS: Limited sample sizes for rare melanoma-susceptibility syndromes (CDK4, POT1).

conclusionSpitzoid morphology was associated with POT1 mutations suggesting that telomere dysfunction (POT1 mutations) may contribute to spitzoid differentiation in melanocytic tumors.

Indexed as

AdultCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16FemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGerm-Line MutationHeterozygoteHumansItalyMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessShelterin ComplexSkinSkin NeoplasmsCDK4 protein, humanCDKN2A protein, humanCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16POT1 protein, humanShelterin ComplexTelomere-Binding ProteinsCDK4CDKN2Afamilial melanomamelanomamelanoma pathologymelanoma-prone familiesmelanoma-susceptibility genesPOT1Spitzspitzoidtumor infiltrating lymphocytes

Identifiers

PMID32283231
PMCPMC7505133
OpenAlexW3016246125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.