Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32282948›Full record

ArticleJPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition2021

How a Malnutrition Quality Improvement Initiative Furthers Malnutrition Measurement and Care: Results From a Hospital Learning Collaborative.

Angel F Valladares, Karl M Kilgore, Jamie Partridge, Suela Sulo, Kirk W Kerr, Sharon McCauley

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Angel F ValladaresSenior Manager, The Center for Healthcare Transformation, Avalere Health, Washington, DC, USA.
Karl M KilgoreHealth Economics and Advanced Analytics, Avalere Health, Washington, DC, USA.
Jamie PartridgeGlobal Scientific Affairs, Abbott Nutrition R&D, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Suela SuloGlobal Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Abbott Nutrition, Abbott Park, Illinois, USA.
Kirk W KerrGlobal Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Abbott Nutrition, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8777-4775
Sharon McCauleyQuality Management, The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Abbott (United States) · USPrevea Health · USAcademy of Nutrition and Dietetics · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalnutrition in hospitalized patients can adversely affect health outcomes and increase the cost of care. Real-world strategies are needed for prompt identification and treatment of patients at risk of malnutrition.

objectivesThe aim of this quality improvement (QI) study was to measure the impact of a nutrition-focused program on the malnutrition care processes of participating hospitals. Secondary objectives were to determine whether improvements in these nutrition-related processes reduced hospital readmissions and length of stay (LOS) in patients ≥65 years.

methodsA group of 27 US hospitals ("The Collaborative") implemented the Malnutrition Quality Improvement Initiative (MQii), as guided by a Malnutrition QI Toolkit and 4 electronic clinical quality measures (eCQMs), including (1) nutrition screening; (2) nutrition assessment following detection of malnutrition risk; (3) nutrition care plan for patients identified as malnourished after completed nutrition assessment; and (4) documentation of malnutrition diagnoses. Multivariate analyses identified the variables best correlated with patient outcomes.

resultsImprovements were observed for all 4 eCQMs. The greatest improvements were achieved as a result of timely nutrition assessment (P = .06) and malnutrition diagnosis (P = .02). Patients ≥65 years with a malnutrition diagnosis and nutrition care plan had a 24% lower likelihood of 30-day readmission but a longer mean LOS than did those without a care plan.

conclusionsIn this study, the implementation of MQii practices significantly improved the identification of malnutrition. The prompt identification and treatment of patients at malnutrition risk can improve patient care and health, as well as reduce costly readmissions.

Indexed as

MalnutritionQuality ImprovementHospitalizationHospitalsHumansLength of StayNutrition Assessmentelectronic clinical quality measure (eCQM)electronic health record (eHR)malnutritionoutcome assessmentquality research

Identifiers

PMID32282948
PMCPMC7984333
OpenAlexW3015743226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.