Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32282826›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2020

Adaptation and validation of the Polish version of the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire among cardiovascular patients and medical students.

Michał Seweryn Karbownik, Beata Jankowska-Polańska, Robert Horne, Karol Maksymilian Górski, Edward Kowalczyk, Janusz Szemraj

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Treatment Adherence in Patients with Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Michał Seweryn KarbownikDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical University of Lodz, Łódź, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4416-2736
Beata Jankowska-PolańskaDepartment of Clinical Nursing, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
Robert HorneCentre for Behavioural Medicine, The School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Karol Maksymilian GórskiDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical University of Lodz, Łódź, Poland.
Edward KowalczykDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical University of Lodz, Łódź, Poland.
Janusz SzemrajDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, Medical University of Lodz, Łódź, Poland.
Medical University of Lodz · PLUniversity College London · GBWroclaw Medical University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) is the leading tool intended to assess the cognitive representation of medication, however, the validated Polish version of the questionnaire is lacking.

aimsTo adapt the original BMQ tool to the Polish language (BMQ-PL) and to validate it. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe BMQ was adapted to Polish according to widely accepted guidelines. A total of 311 cardiovascular in- and outpatients as well as medical students taking chronic medication were surveyed to assess data-to-model fit and internal consistency of the measure. The criterion-related validity was determined with the use of Polish version of the Adherence to Refills and Medications Scale. Confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses were used, as well as general linear modeling.

resultsThe BMQ-PL exhibited the same factorial structure as the original questionnaire and all the items loaded on their expected factors. Internal consistency of the questionnaire was satisfactory in the group of cardiovascular patients (Cronbach's alpha ranging from 0.64 to 0.82 and McDonald's omega from 0.90 to 0.91). There were significant correlations in the predicted directions between all BMQ-PL subscales and the measure of drug adherence in cardiovascular outpatients, but not in inpatients. Medical students may conceptualize the beliefs about medicines in a different way; as a result, a modified version of the BMQ-PL-General, suitable for medically-educated people, was proposed.

conclusionThe BMQ-PL exhibits satisfactory proof of validity to be used among cardiovascular patients.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeMedication AdherenceStudents, MedicalSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultFemaleHumansMalePoland

Identifiers

PMID32282826
PMCPMC7153860
OpenAlexW3015396628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.