Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32282815›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2020

Evaluation of copromicroscopy and serology to measure the exposure to Ascaris infections across age groups and to assess the impact of 3 years of biannual mass drug administration in Jimma Town, Ethiopia.

Daniel Dana, Johnny Vlaminck, Mio Ayana, Bamlaku Tadege, Zeleke Mekonnen, Peter Geldhof, Bruno Levecke

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A Paired-Marker Framework for Interpreting Anti-Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniel DanaSchool of Laboratory Science, Faculty of Health Science, Institute of Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Johnny VlaminckDepartment of Virology, Parasitology and Immunology, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-3601-9825
Mio AyanaSchool of Laboratory Science, Faculty of Health Science, Institute of Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Bamlaku TadegeDepartment of Virology, Parasitology and Immunology, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Zeleke MekonnenSchool of Laboratory Science, Faculty of Health Science, Institute of Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Peter GeldhofDepartment of Virology, Parasitology and Immunology, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Bruno LeveckeDepartment of Virology, Parasitology and Immunology, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8912-5595

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe scientific community has recently summarized the desired characteristics for diagnostic tools across the different phases of a soil-transmitted helminth (STH) mass drug administration (MDA) program. Although serology meets some of the desired criteria, there is a scarcity of data on baseline serological profiles in human populations, both prior to and during MDA programs.

methodsIn this study, we compared the copromicroscopic and the serological infection profiles in 600 school-aged children (SAC) and 600 adults at the advent of the MDA program in Jimma Town, Ethiopia. The serological profiles were examined by two ELISAs that measure IgG4 responses to the Ascaris suum haemoglobin antigen (AsHb) and a somatic extract of lung stage larvae (AsLungL3). Three years into the MDA program, we sampled another group of 600 SAC from the same schools to assess the reduction in prevalence and intensity of Ascaris infections measured by copromicroscopy and serology. PRINCIPAL

findingsPrior to the start of MDA, copromicroscopy revealed an Ascaris prevalence of 31.0% and a mean fecal egg count of 2,919 eggs per gram (EPG) in SAC. Following three years of biannual treatment, the prevalence reduced to 13.2% (57.8% reduction) and the mean fecal egg count to 1,513 EPG (48.1% reduction). This reduction was also reflected in the serological results. The seroprevalence reduced with 40.9% and 27.4% and the mean optical density ratio reduced with 44.2% and 38.2% as measured by the AsHb or AsLungL3 ELISA respectively. We also showed that, despite a decreasing coproprevalence, seroprevalence to Ascaris increased with age.

conclusionsThis study is the first to provide IgG4 response profiles of an endemic population to two different A. suum antigens. The results suggest that exposure to the infectious stages of Ascaris reaches beyond SAC alone. Furthermore, it highlights the possible use of serological assays to monitor changes in STH exposure during MDA programs.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsAntibodies, HelminthAntigens, HelminthAscariasisAscaris suumChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesDrug MonitoringEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayEthiopiaFecesAntibodies, HelminthAntigens, HelminthImmunoglobulin G

Identifiers

PMID32282815
PMCPMC7179930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.