Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32282791›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2020

Improving the coverage of credible sets in Bayesian genetic fine-mapping.

Anna Hutchinson, Hope Watson, Chris Wallace

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Whole-genome sequencing study in Koreans identifies novel loci for Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Functional Genomics in Psoriasis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Genetics of osteoarthritis.Osteoarthritis and cartilage · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anna HutchinsonMRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9224-4410
Hope WatsonMRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5788-9662
Chris WallaceMRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9755-1703
MRC Biostatistics Unit · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00002/4Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT107881
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS) have successfully identified thousands of loci associated with human diseases. Bayesian genetic fine-mapping studies aim to identify the specific causal variants within GWAS loci responsible for each association, reporting credible sets of plausible causal variants, which are interpreted as containing the causal variant with some "coverage probability". Here, we use simulations to demonstrate that the coverage probabilities are over-conservative in most fine-mapping situations. We show that this is because fine-mapping data sets are not randomly selected from amongst all causal variants, but from amongst causal variants with larger effect sizes. We present a method to re-estimate the coverage of credible sets using rapid simulations based on the observed, or estimated, SNP correlation structure, we call this the "adjusted coverage estimate". This is extended to find "adjusted credible sets", which are the smallest set of variants such that their adjusted coverage estimate meets the target coverage. We use our method to improve the resolution of a fine-mapping study of type 1 diabetes. We found that in 27 out of 39 associated genomic regions our method could reduce the number of potentially causal variants to consider for follow-up, and found that none of the 95% or 99% credible sets required the inclusion of more variants-a pattern matched in simulations of well powered GWAS. Crucially, our method requires only GWAS summary statistics and remains accurate when SNP correlations are estimated from a large reference panel. Using our method to improve the resolution of fine-mapping studies will enable more efficient expenditure of resources in the follow-up process of annotating the variants in the credible set to determine the implicated genes and pathways in human diseases.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremComputational BiologyComputer SimulationDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Genome-Wide Association StudyHumansPolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID32282791
PMCPMC7179948
OpenAlexW3015746229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.