ArticlePLoS computational biology2020
Humans adapt their anticipatory eye movements to the volatility of visual motion properties.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- The influence of stimulus and behavioral histories on predictive control of smooth pursuit eye movements.Scientific reports · 2021Trial
- Motion direction biases around the clock: Learned and in-built direction priors pull perception and pursuit apart.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- Prediction-based attention computing: a proof of concept study.Virtual reality · 2026Article
- Anticipatory gaze in a reaching-and-grasping task when target movement direction is uncertain: evidence of statistical learning.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Article
- Anticipatory smooth pursuit eye movements scale with the probability of visual motion: The role of target speed and acceleration.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Comparison of Vernier Acuity Measured with Three Different Water-induced Blur Simulation Methods.Journal of ophthalmic & vision research · 2025Article
- Early Eye Disengagement Is Regulated by Task Complexity and Task Repetition in Visual Tracking Task.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Eye movements track prioritized auditory features in selective attention to natural speech.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Investigating how Explicit Contextual Cues Affect Predictive Sensorimotor Control in Autistic Adults.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2023Article
- Precise Spiking Motifs in Neurobiological and Neuromorphic Data.Brain sciences · 2022Review
- Correction: Humans adapt their anticipatory eye movements to the volatility of visual motion properties.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Animal behavior constantly adapts to changes, for example when the statistical properties of the environment change unexpectedly. For an agent that interacts with this volatile setting, it is important to react accurately and as quickly as possible. It has already been shown that when a random sequence of motion ramps of a visual target is biased to one direction (e.g. right or left), human observers adapt their eye movements to accurately anticipate the target's expected direction. Here, we prove that this ability extends to a volatile environment where the probability bias could change at random switching times. In addition, we also recorded the explicit prediction of the next outcome as reported by observers using a rating scale. Both results were compared to the estimates of a probabilistic agent that is optimal in relation to the assumed generative model. Compared to the classical leaky integrator model, we found a better match between our probabilistic agent and the behavioral responses, both for the anticipatory eye movements and the explicit task. Furthermore, by controlling the level of preference between exploitation and exploration in the model, we were able to fit for each individual's experimental dataset the most likely level of volatility and analyze inter-individual variability across participants. These results prove that in such an unstable environment, human observers can still represent an internal belief about the environmental contingencies, and use this representation both for sensory-motor control and for explicit judgments. This work offers an innovative approach to more generically test the diversity of human cognitive abilities in uncertain and dynamic environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.